Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. MCHP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and MCHP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAFRMMCHP
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Microchip Technology Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization22.71 billion USD28.36 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 13, 2021March 19, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and MCHP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. MCHP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFRMMCHP
5-Day Price Return-7.33%-5.50%
13-Week Price Return-10.43%-21.14%
26-Week Price Return30.72%-14.76%
52-Week Price Return28.62%-21.19%
Month-to-Date Return-1.91%-17.17%
Year-to-Date Return15.78%-9.85%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.31M9.84M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.96M8.17M
3-Month Volatility67.46%37.19%
Beta3.621.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFRM

7.75%

Financial Services Industry

Max
34.42%
Q3
16.76%
Median
9.18%
Q1
3.90%
Min
-10.16%

AFRM’s Return on Equity of 7.75% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MCHP

-2.78%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
49.05%
Q3
22.19%
Median
7.96%
Q1
0.99%
Min
-15.65%

MCHP has a negative Return on Equity of -2.78%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AFRM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

6.74%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.33%
Median
13.11%
Q1
7.04%
Min
-8.99%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, AFRM’s Net Profit Margin of 6.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MCHP

-4.39%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
24.47%
Median
11.88%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-25.46%

MCHP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.39%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AFRM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

4.96%

Financial Services Industry

Max
81.07%
Q3
40.32%
Median
19.93%
Q1
10.20%
Min
-34.40%

AFRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.96% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MCHP

1.18%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.76%
Median
12.14%
Q1
3.29%
Min
-32.60%

MCHP’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.18% is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AFRM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMMCHP
Return on Equity (TTM)7.75%-2.78%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.14%-1.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.74%-4.39%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.96%1.18%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)92.50%54.06%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

4.58

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.26
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MCHP

2.25

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.57
Q3
4.28
Median
2.86
Q1
2.22
Min
1.02

MCHP’s Current Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFRM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

2.35

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.55
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

MCHP

0.80

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
0.48
Median
0.24
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MCHP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AFRM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
140.54
Q3
57.67
Median
6.72
Q1
1.93
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

MCHP

1.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.21
Median
22.37
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MCHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AFRM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMMCHP
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.582.25
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.491.20
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.350.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.761.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFRM vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.52%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.75%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MCHP

3.58%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
1.59%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.58%, MCHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFRM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
17.51%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MCHP

656.12%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
211.90%
Q3
88.01%
Median
25.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 656.12%, MCHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

AFRM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMMCHP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%656.12%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

96.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
46.13
Q3
28.79
Median
13.18
Q1
9.14
Min
0.47

At 96.53, AFRM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MCHP

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
95.58
Q3
58.67
Median
34.77
Q1
25.45
Min
12.63

P/E Ratio data for MCHP is currently unavailable.

AFRM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

6.50

Financial Services Industry

Max
9.71
Q3
4.81
Median
2.49
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

MCHP

6.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
18.34
Q3
10.38
Median
5.38
Q1
2.49
Min
0.32

MCHP’s P/S Ratio of 6.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFRM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

7.21

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.21
Q3
3.51
Median
1.52
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 7.21 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MCHP

5.18

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.22
Q3
8.33
Median
4.39
Q1
1.79
Min
0.30

MCHP’s P/B Ratio of 5.18 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFRM vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMMCHP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)96.53--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.506.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.215.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.2538.31