Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. JKHY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and JKHY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AFRM’s market capitalization of 22.30 billion USD is substantially larger than JKHY’s 13.20 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to JKHY (beta: 0.73), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAFRMJKHY
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureInformation Technology Services
CEOMax Roth LevchinGregory R. Adelson
Price69.19 USD181.32 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD13.20 billion USD
Beta3.580.73
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021November 20, 1985
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and JKHY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. JKHY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

JKHY

22.07%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

JKHY’s Return on Equity of 22.07% is on par with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

JKHY

16.06%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

In the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, JKHY’s Return on Invested Capital of 16.06% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

JKHY

18.50%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.50% places JKHY in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

JKHY

23.22%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.22% places JKHY in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMJKHY
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%22.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%14.64%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%16.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%18.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%23.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%42.06%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

JKHY

1.36

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

JKHY’s Current Ratio of 1.36 aligns with the median group of the Information Technology Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

JKHY

0.08

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, JKHY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

JKHY

44.06

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 44.06, JKHY demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Information Technology Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMJKHY
Current Ratio (TTM)63.091.36
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.091.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.560.08
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.710.06
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.750.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.2444.06

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and JKHY. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JKHY

1.25%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JKHY’s Dividend Yield of 1.25% is consistent with its peers in the Information Technology Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JKHY

37.87%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JKHY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 37.87% is in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMJKHY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.25%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%37.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

JKHY

30.76

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

JKHY’s P/E Ratio of 30.76 is within the middle range for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

JKHY

3.43

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

JKHY’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.43 is within the middle range of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JKHY

5.69

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

JKHY’s P/S Ratio of 5.69 is in the upper echelon for the Information Technology Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

JKHY

6.48

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

AFRM vs. JKHY: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMJKHY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.5130.76
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.163.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.425.69
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.806.48
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.6343.62
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.0617.26
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.415.75