Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAFRMJBL
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Jabil Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization24.51 billion USD22.16 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 13, 2021May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFRMJBL
5-Day Price Return-2.82%-4.25%
13-Week Price Return8.95%-6.66%
26-Week Price Return93.40%67.24%
52-Week Price Return94.95%68.87%
Month-to-Date Return2.97%-4.90%
Year-to-Date Return23.56%43.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.85M1.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.87M1.55M
3-Month Volatility61.23%35.11%
Beta3.641.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFRM

1.80%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

AFRM’s Return on Equity of 1.80% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

JBL

45.71%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 45.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AFRM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

1.62%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, AFRM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.62% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

JBL

2.20%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.20% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AFRM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

-0.29%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.29%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

JBL

3.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.97% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AFRM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)1.80%45.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.49%3.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.62%2.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.29%3.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)92.49%8.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

4.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

JBL

1.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

JBL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AFRM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

2.48

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

JBL

1.91

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.91, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AFRM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

JBL

4.08

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AFRM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.201.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.200.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.481.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.764.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFRM vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL

0.16%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AFRM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL

5.48%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.48% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFRM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%5.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

469.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

At 469.59, AFRM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

JBL

33.47

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 33.47 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

7.60

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

JBL

0.74

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.74 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AFRM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

7.27

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 7.27 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

JBL

14.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 14.53, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AFRM vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)469.5933.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.600.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.2714.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.7318.76