Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and IONQ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AFRM’s market capitalization of 22.30 billion USD is substantially larger than IONQ’s 11.61 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 3.58 for AFRM and 2.59 for IONQ, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAFRMIONQ
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.IonQ, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureComputer Hardware
CEOMax Roth LevchinNiccolo Mcleod de Masi
Price69.19 USD44.39 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD11.61 billion USD
Beta3.582.59
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021January 4, 2021
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and IONQ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. IONQ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

IONQ

-63.35%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

IONQ has a negative Return on Equity of -63.35%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

IONQ

-31.70%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

IONQ has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -31.70%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

IONQ

-753.20%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

IONQ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -753.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IONQ

-592.84%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

IONQ has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -592.84%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMIONQ
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%-63.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%-38.15%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%-31.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%-753.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%-592.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%50.07%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

IONQ

13.17

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

IONQ’s Current Ratio of 13.17 is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

IONQ

0.02

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, IONQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

IONQ

--

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

Interest Coverage Ratio data for IONQ is currently unavailable.

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMIONQ
Current Ratio (TTM)63.0913.17
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.0912.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.560.02
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.710.02
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.750.61
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.24--

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and IONQ. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IONQ

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IONQ

-0.01%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -0.01%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMIONQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%-0.01%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

IONQ

-31.31

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

IONQ has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.31. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

IONQ

13.67

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IONQ

269.73

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

With a P/S Ratio of 269.73, IONQ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Computer Hardware industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

IONQ

13.27

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

IONQ’s P/B Ratio of 13.27 is within the conventional range for the Computer Hardware industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFRM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMIONQ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.51-31.31
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.1613.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.42269.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.8013.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.63-59.29
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.06-49.02
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.41266.43