Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. HPQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and HPQ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AFRM’s market capitalization stands at 22.30 billion USD, while HPQ’s is 24.42 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to HPQ (beta: 1.31), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAFRMHPQ
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.HP Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureComputer Hardware
CEOMax Roth LevchinEnrique J. Lores
Price69.19 USD26 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD24.42 billion USD
Beta3.581.31
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021November 6, 1957
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and HPQ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. HPQ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HPQ

-1,205.75%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

HPQ has a negative Return on Equity of -1,205.75%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

HPQ

21.75%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

In the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, HPQ’s Return on Invested Capital of 21.75% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HPQ

4.64%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

HPQ’s Net Profit Margin of 4.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

HPQ

6.32%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

HPQ’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.32% is around the midpoint for the Computer Hardware industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMHPQ
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%-1205.75%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%6.49%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%21.75%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%4.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%6.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%21.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

HPQ

0.73

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

HPQ’s Current Ratio of 0.73 falls into the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

HPQ

3.64

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.64, HPQ operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Computer Hardware industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HPQ

8.60

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

HPQ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Computer Hardware industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMHPQ
Current Ratio (TTM)63.090.73
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.090.42
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.563.64
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.710.28
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.751.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.248.60

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and HPQ. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HPQ

4.40%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.40%, HPQ offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Computer Hardware industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HPQ

42.79%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HPQ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 42.79% is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMHPQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.40%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%42.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

HPQ

9.81

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

HPQ’s P/E Ratio of 9.81 is below the typical range for the Computer Hardware industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

HPQ

1.32

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HPQ

0.45

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

In the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, HPQ’s P/S Ratio of 0.45 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

HPQ

8.37

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

HPQ’s P/B Ratio of 8.37 is within the conventional range for the Computer Hardware industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFRM vs. HPQ: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMHPQ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.519.81
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.161.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.420.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.808.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.639.18
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.067.92
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.410.60