Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. HPE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and HPE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAFRMHPE
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization24.51 billion USD34.41 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 13, 2021October 19, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and HPE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. HPE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFRMHPE
5-Day Price Return-2.82%6.54%
13-Week Price Return8.95%25.38%
26-Week Price Return93.40%90.64%
52-Week Price Return94.95%25.02%
Month-to-Date Return2.97%6.19%
Year-to-Date Return23.56%22.15%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.85M22.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.87M20.31M
3-Month Volatility61.23%26.69%
Beta3.641.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFRM

1.80%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

AFRM’s Return on Equity of 1.80% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

HPE

5.08%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
27.52%
Median
9.18%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-1.04%

HPE’s Return on Equity of 5.08% is in the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AFRM vs. HPE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

1.62%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, AFRM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.62% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

HPE

3.77%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
16.15%
Q3
7.95%
Median
4.80%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-0.29%

HPE’s Net Profit Margin of 3.77% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. HPE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

-0.29%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.29%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

HPE

3.91%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.74%
Median
6.27%
Q1
4.07%
Min
1.97%

HPE’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.91% is in the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AFRM vs. HPE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMHPE
Return on Equity (TTM)1.80%5.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.49%1.74%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.62%3.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.29%3.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)92.49%29.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

4.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

HPE

0.95

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.04
Median
1.41
Q1
0.98
Min
0.11

HPE’s Current Ratio of 0.95 falls into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AFRM vs. HPE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

2.48

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

HPE

0.97

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.85
Median
0.32
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

HPE’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AFRM vs. HPE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

HPE

116.71

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
76.01
Median
19.47
Q1
5.91
Min
-23.93

HPE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 116.71 is in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AFRM vs. HPE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMHPE
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.200.95
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.200.69
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.480.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.76116.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. HPE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFRM vs. HPE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HPE

2.23%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.33%
Q3
3.29%
Median
1.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HPE’s Dividend Yield of 2.23% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AFRM vs. HPE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HPE

24.59%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
77.17%
Median
40.90%
Q1
3.87%
Min
0.00%

HPE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.59% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFRM vs. HPE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMHPE
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%24.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

469.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

At 469.59, AFRM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HPE

27.47

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.10
Q3
28.67
Median
19.23
Q1
15.53
Min
9.46

HPE’s P/E Ratio of 27.47 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. HPE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

7.60

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

HPE

1.04

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
5.63
Q3
3.18
Median
1.10
Q1
0.49
Min
0.04

HPE’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFRM vs. HPE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

7.27

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 7.27 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HPE

1.11

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
6.87
Median
1.88
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

HPE’s P/B Ratio of 1.11 is within the conventional range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFRM vs. HPE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMHPE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)469.5927.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.601.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.271.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.7315.94