Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. GIB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and GIB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AFRM’s market capitalization stands at 22.30 billion USD, while GIB’s is 23.55 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to GIB (beta: 0.65), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAFRMGIB
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.CGI Inc.
CountryUSCA
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureInformation Technology Services
CEOMax Roth LevchinFrancois Boulanger
Price69.19 USD106.19 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD23.55 billion USD
Beta3.580.65
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021October 7, 1998
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and GIB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. GIB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GIB

18.19%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

GIB’s Return on Equity of 18.19% is on par with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

GIB

-104.90%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

GIB has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -104.90%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GIB

11.52%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

GIB’s Net Profit Margin of 11.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GIB

-142.29%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

GIB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -142.29%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMGIB
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%18.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%9.32%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%-104.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%11.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%-142.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%-137.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GIB

1.27

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

GIB’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Information Technology Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GIB

0.43

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

GIB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.43 is typical for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GIB

-240.43

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

GIB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -240.43. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMGIB
Current Ratio (TTM)63.091.27
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.090.92
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.560.43
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.710.23
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.751.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.24-240.43

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and GIB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GIB

0.35%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GIB’s Dividend Yield of 0.35% is consistent with its peers in the Information Technology Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GIB

3.91%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GIB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.91% is within the typical range for the Information Technology Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMGIB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%3.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

GIB

18.55

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

GIB’s P/E Ratio of 18.55 is within the middle range for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

GIB

2.62

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

GIB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.62 is within the middle range of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GIB

2.09

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

GIB’s P/S Ratio of 2.09 aligns with the market consensus for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

GIB

3.18

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

AFRM vs. GIB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMGIB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.5118.55
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.162.62
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.422.09
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.803.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.6315.94
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.0611.66
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.412.31