AFRM vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and FIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	AFRM	FIS
Company Name	Affirm Holdings, Inc.	Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Financial Services	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	22.71 billion USD	33.77 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	January 13, 2021	June 20, 2001
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and FIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. FIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AFRM	FIS
5-Day Price Return	-7.33%	-1.83%
13-Week Price Return	-10.43%	-9.30%
26-Week Price Return	30.72%	-17.30%
52-Week Price Return	28.62%	-27.72%
Month-to-Date Return	-1.91%	2.75%
Year-to-Date Return	15.78%	-20.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume	7.31M	4.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume	6.96M	3.90M
3-Month Volatility	67.46%	24.59%
Beta	3.62	0.94

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFRM

7.75%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 34.42%
Q3: 16.76%
Median: 9.18%
Q1: 3.90%
Min: -10.16%

AFRM’s Return on Equity of 7.75% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FIS

1.03%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 34.42%
Q3: 16.76%
Median: 9.18%
Q1: 3.90%
Min: -10.16%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 1.03% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

6.74%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.33%
Median: 13.11%
Q1: 7.04%
Min: -8.99%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, AFRM’s Net Profit Margin of 6.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FIS

1.45%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.33%
Median: 13.11%
Q1: 7.04%
Min: -8.99%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.45% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

4.96%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 81.07%
Q3: 40.32%
Median: 19.93%
Q1: 10.20%
Min: -34.40%

AFRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.96% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FIS

13.74%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 81.07%
Q3: 40.32%
Median: 19.93%
Q1: 10.20%
Min: -34.40%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.74% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AFRM	FIS
Return on Equity (TTM)	7.75%	1.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.14%	0.46%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	6.74%	1.45%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	4.96%	13.74%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	92.50%	36.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

4.58

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.36
Q3: 2.26
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FIS

0.53

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.36
Q3: 2.26
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

2.35

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.11
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

FIS

0.94

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.11
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max: 140.54
Q3: 57.67
Median: 6.72
Q1: 1.93
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

FIS

5.52

Financial Services Industry

Max: 140.54
Q3: 57.67
Median: 6.72
Q1: 1.93
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AFRM	FIS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	4.58	0.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	4.49	0.41
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.35	0.94
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-3.76	5.52

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFRM vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.52%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.75%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIS

2.50%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.52%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.75%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.50% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 17.51%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FIS

99.68%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 17.51%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 99.68% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AFRM	FIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	2.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	99.68%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

96.53

Financial Services Industry

Max: 46.13
Q3: 28.79
Median: 13.18
Q1: 9.14
Min: 0.47

At 96.53, AFRM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FIS

218.86

Financial Services Industry

Max: 46.13
Q3: 28.79
Median: 13.18
Q1: 9.14
Min: 0.47

At 218.86, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

6.50

Financial Services Industry

Max: 9.71
Q3: 4.81
Median: 2.49
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

FIS

3.18

Financial Services Industry

Max: 9.71
Q3: 4.81
Median: 2.49
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

7.21

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.21
Q3: 3.51
Median: 1.52
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 7.21 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FIS

2.49

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.21
Q3: 3.51
Median: 1.52
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.49 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AFRM	FIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	96.53	218.86
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	6.50	3.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	7.21	2.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	29.25	17.62