Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and FIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

FIS’s market capitalization of 42.96 billion USD is significantly greater than AFRM’s 22.30 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to FIS (beta: 1.08), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAFRMFIS
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureConsumer Electronics
CEOMax Roth LevchinStephanie L. Ferris
Price69.19 USD81.77 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD42.96 billion USD
Beta3.581.08
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021June 20, 2001
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and FIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. FIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FIS

5.13%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.30%
Q3
14.30%
Median
5.13%
Q1
-15.88%
Min
-27.23%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 5.13% is on par with the norm for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

FIS

4.09%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
4.18%
Q3
4.18%
Median
4.09%
Q1
-0.34%
Min
-0.34%

FIS’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.09% is in line with the norm for the Consumer Electronics industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FIS

8.10%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
8.81%
Median
8.10%
Q1
-4.74%
Min
-7.22%

FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.10% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Consumer Electronics industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FIS

16.77%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
31.81%
Q3
16.77%
Median
10.95%
Q1
-0.21%
Min
-4.78%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.77% is around the midpoint for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMFIS
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%5.13%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%2.51%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%4.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%8.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%16.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%37.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FIS

0.63

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
0.82
Q3
0.82
Median
0.70
Q1
0.64
Min
0.63

FIS’s Current Ratio of 0.63 falls into the lower quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FIS

0.80

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
2.23
Q3
1.47
Median
0.80
Q1
0.51
Min
0.16

FIS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80 is typical for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FIS

6.73

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.74
Q3
8.73
Median
3.32
Q1
-40.43
Min
-114.16

FIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMFIS
Current Ratio (TTM)63.090.63
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.090.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.560.80
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.710.37
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.753.28
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.246.73

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and FIS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIS

1.86%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
1.88%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.50%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.86%, FIS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Consumer Electronics industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FIS

98.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
98.30%
Q3
15.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 98.30% is in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMFIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.86%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%98.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

FIS

52.33

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
51.71
Q3
41.35
Median
30.99
Q1
25.46
Min
19.94

At 52.33, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Consumer Electronics industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

FIS

7.25

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.16
Q3
5.62
Median
3.99
Q1
2.77
Min
2.43

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Consumer Electronics industry.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FIS

4.22

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.50
Q3
4.17
Median
1.76
Q1
0.88
Min
0.16

FIS’s P/S Ratio of 4.22 is in the upper echelon for the Consumer Electronics industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

FIS

2.87

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
3.36
Q3
3.36
Median
2.83
Q1
2.78
Min
2.78

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.87 is within the conventional range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFRM vs. FIS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMFIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.5152.33
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.167.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.424.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.802.87
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.6327.23
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.0615.75
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.415.32