AFRM vs. ESTC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFRM and ESTC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AFRM dwarfs ESTC in market cap, clocking in at 15.24 billion USD—about 1.61 times the 9.47 billion USD of its counterpart.
AFRM rides a wilder wave with a beta of 3.66, hinting at bigger swings than ESTC’s steadier 1.20.
| Symbol | AFRM | ESTC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Affirm Holdings, Inc. | Elastic N.V. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Max Roth Levchin | Mr. Ashutosh Kulkarni |
| Price | 47.24 USD | 90.65 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.24 billion USD | 9.47 billion USD |
| Beta | 3.664 | 1.199 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | January 13, 2021 | October 5, 2018 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFRM and ESTC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AFRM and ESTC based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Both AFRM at -246.14 and ESTC at -71.03 have negative P/E values over the past twelve months. This reflects consistent losses rather than profits, meaning their current operations aren’t generating positive net income—a situation that could challenge their financial stability if prolonged.
- AFRM carries a negative Forward PEG of -1.38, hinting at analyst expectations of losses or shrinking earnings in the coming period—a potential warning for its future performance. On the flip side, ESTC at 2.28 sidesteps this concern with a more favorable outlook.
| Symbol | AFRM | ESTC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -246.14 | -71.03 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.38 | 2.28 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.07 | 6.62 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.32 | 10.98 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 25.04 | 41.52 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 69.85 | -318.01 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.07 | 6.62 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 34.90 | 41.54 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AFRM nor ESTC pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.
| Symbol | AFRM | ESTC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFRM and ESTC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AFRM at -0.24 and ESTC at -3.16 both scrape by with interest coverage under 1.5. Earnings are stretched thin against interest bills, leaving little wiggle room if profits drop.
| Symbol | AFRM | ESTC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 2.02 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 2.02 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.56 | 0.68 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.71 | 0.25 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -0.24 | -3.16 |