Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. EA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and EA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

EA’s market capitalization of 38.96 billion USD is significantly greater than AFRM’s 22.30 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to EA (beta: 0.71), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAFRMEA
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Electronic Arts Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureElectronic Gaming & Multimedia
CEOMax Roth LevchinAndrew Wilson
Price69.19 USD155.37 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD38.96 billion USD
Beta3.580.71
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021September 20, 1989
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and EA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. EA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

EA

15.68%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
22.45%
Q3
13.61%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-70.13%
Min
-121.78%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, EA’s Return on Equity of 15.68% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

EA

11.36%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
17.62%
Q3
11.24%
Median
1.98%
Q1
-22.67%
Min
-64.64%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, EA’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.36% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

EA

15.03%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.20%
Q3
16.08%
Median
10.20%
Q1
-7.35%
Min
-22.94%

EA’s Net Profit Margin of 15.03% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

EA

20.45%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.10%
Q3
17.15%
Median
5.89%
Q1
-19.43%
Min
-26.48%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.45% places EA in the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMEA
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%15.68%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%9.06%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%11.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%15.03%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%20.45%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%79.08%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

EA

0.95

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
2.77
Median
1.19
Q1
0.82
Min
0.01

EA’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EA

0.31

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
1.14
Median
0.31
Q1
0.17
Min
0.09

EA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EA

20.61

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
20.61
Q3
4.69
Median
-1.31
Q1
-20.23
Min
-25.09

EA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.61 is in the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMEA
Current Ratio (TTM)63.090.95
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.090.95
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.560.31
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.710.16
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.75-0.10
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.2420.61

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and EA. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EA

0.49%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
8.44%
Q3
0.36%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.49%, EA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EA

17.75%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
106.44%
Q3
13.31%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.75% is in the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMEA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.49%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%17.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

EA

36.31

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
36.87
Q3
20.95
Median
12.73
Q1
7.31
Min
3.67

A P/E Ratio of 36.31 places EA in the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

EA

1.95

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
2.24
Median
1.87
Q1
1.76
Min
1.76

EA’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.95 is within the middle range of its peers in the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EA

5.23

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
7.60
Q3
6.29
Median
3.76
Q1
1.02
Min
0.66

EA’s P/S Ratio of 5.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

EA

6.37

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
6.47
Q3
6.47
Median
4.48
Q1
1.29
Min
0.36

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry.

AFRM vs. EA: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMEA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.5136.31
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.161.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.425.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.806.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.6320.97
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.0620.86
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.415.20