Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. DUOL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and DUOL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAFRMDUOL
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Duolingo, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesDiversified Consumer Services
Market Capitalization23.54 billion USD15.53 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 13, 2021July 28, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and DUOL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. DUOL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFRMDUOL
5-Day Price Return-4.95%2.73%
13-Week Price Return40.50%-34.86%
26-Week Price Return-2.38%-21.25%
52-Week Price Return159.61%63.57%
Month-to-Date Return7.73%-2.21%
Year-to-Date Return21.28%4.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.47M2.91M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.45M1.17M
3-Month Volatility52.09%57.15%
Beta3.680.84

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFRM

-2.22%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

DUOL

13.32%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
32.65%
Q3
29.77%
Median
16.63%
Q1
11.08%
Min
2.26%

DUOL’s Return on Equity of 13.32% is on par with the norm for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. DUOL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

-2.33%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.33%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

DUOL

13.24%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
18.84%
Q3
13.34%
Median
12.22%
Q1
7.92%
Min
3.76%

DUOL’s Net Profit Margin of 13.24% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. DUOL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

-5.22%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.22%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

DUOL

9.54%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
19.23%
Median
15.23%
Q1
8.71%
Min
-0.71%

DUOL’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.54% is around the midpoint for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. DUOL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMDUOL
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%13.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.61%8.57%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.33%13.24%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5.22%9.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--72.05%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

4.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

DUOL

2.81

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
1.97
Median
1.66
Q1
0.60
Min
0.15

DUOL’s Current Ratio of 2.81 is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. DUOL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

2.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

DUOL

0.00

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
1.22
Median
0.36
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, DUOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AFRM vs. DUOL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

DUOL

--

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
13.44
Q3
10.58
Median
5.57
Q1
3.04
Min
-2.17

Interest Coverage Ratio data for DUOL is currently unavailable.

AFRM vs. DUOL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMDUOL
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.492.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.412.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.490.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.76--

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. DUOL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFRM vs. DUOL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

DUOL

0.00%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
0.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DUOL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFRM vs. DUOL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

DUOL

0.00%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
35.94%
Q3
25.79%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DUOL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFRM vs. DUOL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMDUOL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

P/E Ratio data for AFRM is currently unavailable.

DUOL

132.51

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
33.95
Q3
25.14
Median
19.27
Q1
15.30
Min
5.58

At 132.51, DUOL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AFRM vs. DUOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

8.81

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

DUOL

17.54

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.29
Q3
2.54
Median
2.27
Q1
1.92
Min
1.28

With a P/S Ratio of 17.54, DUOL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AFRM vs. DUOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

5.03

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 5.03 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

DUOL

19.08

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
7.00
Q3
6.37
Median
3.31
Q1
2.13
Min
0.98

At 19.08, DUOL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AFRM vs. DUOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMDUOL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--132.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.8117.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.0319.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.6848.30