AFRM vs. CSCO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFRM and CSCO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CSCO stands out with 251.43 billion USD in market value—about 16.50× AFRM’s market cap of 15.24 billion USD.
AFRM’s beta of 3.66 points to much larger expected swings compared to CSCO’s calmer 0.89, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AFRM | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Affirm Holdings, Inc. | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment |
| CEO | Mr. Max Roth Levchin | Mr. Charles H. Robbins |
| Price | 47.24 USD | 63.2 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.24 billion USD | 251.43 billion USD |
| Beta | 3.66 | 0.89 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | January 13, 2021 | February 16, 1990 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFRM and CSCO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AFRM and CSCO based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AFRM posts a negative P/E of -246.14, reflecting last year’s net loss, while CSCO at 25.69 signals healthy earnings.
- AFRM posts a negative forward PEG of -1.38, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas CSCO at 3.65 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | AFRM | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -246.14 | 25.69 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.38 | 3.65 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.07 | 4.52 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.32 | 5.48 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 25.04 | 18.64 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 69.85 | 25.92 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.07 | 4.90 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 34.90 | 20.20 |
Dividend Comparison
AFRM offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while CSCO provides a 2.55% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AFRM | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.55% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFRM and CSCO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- CSCO’s current ratio of 0.95 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AFRM at 63.09 maintains healthy liquidity.
- Both AFRM and CSCO report negative interest coverage ratios (-0.24, -13.99), meaning EBIT itself is negative—neither can cover interest, a critical solvency warning.
| Symbol | AFRM | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 0.95 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 0.87 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.56 | 0.64 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.71 | 0.24 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -0.24 | -13.99 |