Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. CRWV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and CRWV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

CRWV’s market capitalization of 78.90 billion USD is significantly greater than AFRM’s 22.30 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

SymbolAFRMCRWV
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Infrastructure
CEOMax Roth LevchinMichael N. Intrator
Price69.19 USD164.38 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD78.90 billion USD
Beta3.58--
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021March 28, 2025
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and CRWV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. CRWV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CRWV

-90.88%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

CRWV has a negative Return on Equity of -90.88%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their ROE against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

CRWV

0.65%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

CRWV’s Return on Invested Capital of 0.65% is in line with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their ROIC against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CRWV

-25.83%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

CRWV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -25.83%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CRWV

5.32%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

CRWV’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.32% is around the midpoint for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMCRWV
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%-90.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%-2.27%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%0.65%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%-25.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%5.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%73.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CRWV

0.44

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

CRWV’s Current Ratio of 0.44 falls into the lower quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CRWV

3.88

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.88, CRWV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Software - Infrastructure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CRWV

0.23

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

CRWV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.23 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMCRWV
Current Ratio (TTM)63.090.44
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.090.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.563.88
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.710.54
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.7511.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.240.23

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and CRWV. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRWV

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRWV

-11.01%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -11.01%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMCRWV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%-11.01%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

CRWV

-81.52

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

CRWV has a negative P/E Ratio of -81.52. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

CRWV

0.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

In the lower quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, CRWV’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.51 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRWV

41.14

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 41.14, CRWV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

CRWV

13.15

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

AFRM vs. CRWV: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Software - Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMCRWV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.51-81.52
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.160.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.4241.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.8013.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.63-18.10
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.0696.24
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.4146.68