AFRM vs. CFLT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFRM and CFLT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AFRM dominates in value with a market cap of 15.24 billion USD, eclipsing CFLT’s 7.17 billion USD by roughly 2.13×.
AFRM’s beta of 3.66 points to much larger expected swings compared to CFLT’s calmer 1.02, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AFRM | CFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Affirm Holdings, Inc. | Confluent, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Max Roth Levchin | Mr. Edward Kreps |
| Price | 47.24 USD | 21.05 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.24 billion USD | 7.17 billion USD |
| Beta | 3.66 | 1.02 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | January 13, 2021 | June 24, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFRM and CFLT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AFRM and CFLT based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither AFRM nor CFLT turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -246.14 and -22.11, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- Analysts assign negative forward PEG ratios to both AFRM (-1.38) and CFLT (-0.66), suggesting expectation of shrinking or negative earnings in the upcoming period—a worrying sign for their profit outlook.
| Symbol | AFRM | CFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -246.14 | -22.11 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.38 | -0.66 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.07 | 7.04 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.32 | 6.89 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 25.04 | 551.81 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 69.85 | -20.64 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.07 | 7.86 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 34.90 | 615.75 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AFRM nor CFLT currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AFRM | CFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFRM and CFLT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AFRM has negative EBIT (interest coverage -0.24), unable to cover interest, while CFLT shows “--” (negligible interest expense).
| Symbol | AFRM | CFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 4.42 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 4.42 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.56 | 1.08 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.71 | 0.41 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -0.24 | -- |