Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. APH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and APH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAFRMAPH
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Amphenol Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization24.51 billion USD153.58 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 13, 2021November 8, 1991
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and APH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. APH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFRMAPH
5-Day Price Return-2.82%1.79%
13-Week Price Return8.95%28.08%
26-Week Price Return93.40%100.75%
52-Week Price Return94.95%100.14%
Month-to-Date Return2.97%1.65%
Year-to-Date Return23.56%81.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.85M7.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.87M8.62M
3-Month Volatility61.23%24.30%
Beta3.641.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFRM

1.80%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

AFRM’s Return on Equity of 1.80% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

APH

30.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

APH’s Return on Equity of 30.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AFRM vs. APH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

1.62%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, AFRM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.62% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

APH

16.90%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.90% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AFRM vs. APH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

-0.29%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.29%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

APH

22.41%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.41% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AFRM vs. APH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMAPH
Return on Equity (TTM)1.80%30.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.49%14.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.62%16.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.29%22.41%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)92.49%34.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

4.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

APH

2.02

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

APH’s Current Ratio of 2.02 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFRM vs. APH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

2.48

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

APH

0.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AFRM vs. APH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

APH

14.88

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AFRM vs. APH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMAPH
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.202.02
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.201.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.480.70
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.7614.88

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. APH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFRM vs. APH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APH

0.48%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Yield of 0.48% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AFRM vs. APH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APH

22.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.97% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFRM vs. APH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMAPH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%22.97%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

469.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

At 469.59, AFRM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

APH

47.80

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

A P/E Ratio of 47.80 places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AFRM vs. APH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

7.60

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

APH

8.08

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

With a P/S Ratio of 8.08, APH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AFRM vs. APH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

7.27

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 7.27 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

APH

10.37

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 10.37, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AFRM vs. APH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMAPH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)469.5947.80
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.608.08
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.2710.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.7353.94