Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. ANET: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and ANET, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAFRMANET
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Arista Networks Inc
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization23.54 billion USD165.24 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 13, 2021June 6, 2014
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and ANET by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. ANET: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFRMANET
5-Day Price Return-4.95%-3.67%
13-Week Price Return40.50%35.96%
26-Week Price Return-2.38%19.79%
52-Week Price Return159.61%49.36%
Month-to-Date Return7.73%6.70%
Year-to-Date Return21.28%18.95%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.47M8.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.45M9.86M
3-Month Volatility52.09%53.44%
Beta3.681.48

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFRM

-2.22%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ANET

32.30%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

ANET’s Return on Equity of 32.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AFRM vs. ANET: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

-2.33%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.33%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ANET

40.89%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

ANET’s Net Profit Margin of 40.89% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AFRM vs. ANET: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

-5.22%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.22%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ANET

43.14%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

ANET’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.14% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

AFRM vs. ANET: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMANET
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%32.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.61%22.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.33%40.89%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5.22%43.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--64.24%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

4.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ANET

3.33

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

ANET’s Current Ratio of 3.33 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

AFRM vs. ANET: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

2.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

ANET

0.00

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ANET’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AFRM vs. ANET: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

ANET

171.78

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

ANET’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 171.78 is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AFRM vs. ANET: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMANET
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.493.33
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.412.58
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.490.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.76171.78

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. ANET: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFRM vs. ANET: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFRM vs. ANET: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFRM vs. ANET: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMANET
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

P/E Ratio data for AFRM is currently unavailable.

ANET

51.33

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

A P/E Ratio of 51.33 places ANET in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AFRM vs. ANET: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

8.81

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

ANET

20.99

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

With a P/S Ratio of 20.99, ANET trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AFRM vs. ANET: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

5.03

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 5.03 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ANET

11.79

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

At 11.79, ANET’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AFRM vs. ANET: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMANET
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--51.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.8120.99
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.0311.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.6841.98