Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. ALAB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and ALAB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AFRM’s market capitalization stands at 22.30 billion USD, while ALAB’s is 14.97 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

AFRM’s beta of 3.58 points to significantly higher volatility compared to ALAB (beta: 1.40), suggesting AFRM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAFRMALAB
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSemiconductors
CEOMax Roth LevchinJitendra Mohan
Price69.19 USD90.8 USD
Market Cap22.30 billion USD14.97 billion USD
Beta3.581.40
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJanuary 13, 2021March 20, 2024
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and ALAB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. ALAB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFRM

-2.22%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ALAB

4.43%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ALAB’s Return on Equity of 4.43% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFRM

-0.85%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

AFRM has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.85%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ALAB

-4.25%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

ALAB has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -4.25%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ALAB

8.44%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

ALAB’s Net Profit Margin of 8.44% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFRM

-2.53%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.53%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ALAB

-4.45%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

ALAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMALAB
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.22%4.43%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.60%3.69%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-0.85%-4.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-2.07%8.44%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.53%-4.45%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.61%75.76%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFRM

63.09

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

AFRM’s Current Ratio of 63.09 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ALAB

13.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ALAB’s Current Ratio of 13.92 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFRM

2.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AFRM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software - Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ALAB

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for ALAB is currently unavailable.

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFRM

-0.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

AFRM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ALAB

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ALAB is currently unavailable.

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMALAB
Current Ratio (TTM)63.0913.92
Quick Ratio (TTM)63.0913.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.56--
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.71--
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)19.754.76
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.24--

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFRM and ALAB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ALAB

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFRM

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ALAB

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMALAB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFRM

-360.51

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

AFRM has a negative P/E Ratio of -360.51. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ALAB

357.98

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

At 357.98, ALAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFRM

-6.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

AFRM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.16. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

ALAB

10.80

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFRM

7.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

AFRM’s P/S Ratio of 7.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ALAB

30.53

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 30.53, ALAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFRM

7.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

ALAB

14.23

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.23, ALAB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AFRM vs. ALAB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Software - Infrastructure and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMALAB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-360.51357.98
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.1610.80
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.4230.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.8014.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)36.63138.44
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)93.06-820.32
EV-to-Sales (TTM)9.4130.35