AFL vs. UPST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and UPST, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AFL dominates in value with a market cap of 55.98 billion USD, eclipsing UPST’s 4.18 billion USD by roughly 13.40×.
UPST carries a higher beta at 2.39, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AFL remains steadier at 0.83.
| Symbol | AFL | UPST |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | Upstart Holdings, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Financial - Credit Services |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. David J. Girouard |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 43.92 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 4.18 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.83 | 2.39 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | December 16, 2020 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and UPST over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AFL and UPST based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- UPST shows a negative P/E of -62.33, highlighting a year of losses, whereas AFL at 15.70 trades on solid profitability.
- UPST shows a negative forward PEG of -1.99, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AFL at 2.37 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | AFL | UPST |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | -62.33 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | -1.99 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 5.79 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 6.12 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 39.49 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | -87.29 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 6.87 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 46.83 |
Dividend Comparison
AFL delivers a 2.09% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas UPST appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AFL | UPST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and UPST, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AFL’s current ratio of 0.00 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while UPST at 4.06 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AFL’s quick ratio of 0.00 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas UPST at 4.06 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AFL meets its interest obligations (ratio 21.95). In stark contrast, UPST’s negative ratio (-2.43) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | AFL | UPST |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 4.06 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 4.06 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 2.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.60 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | -2.43 |