Seek Returns logo

AFL vs. UBS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFL and UBS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

UBS’s market capitalization of 111.19 billion USD is significantly greater than AFL’s 56.54 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.81 for AFL and 0.94 for UBS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

UBS is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AFL, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAFLUBS
Company NameAflac IncorporatedUBS Group AG
CountryUSCH
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - LifeBanks - Diversified
CEODaniel Paul AmosSergio P. Ermotti
Price104.57 USD34.88 USD
Market Cap56.54 billion USD111.19 billion USD
Beta0.810.94
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980May 16, 2000
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFL and UBS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFL vs. UBS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFL

13.91%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
23.38%
Q3
14.56%
Median
11.23%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-5.23%

AFL’s Return on Equity of 13.91% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Life industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBS

5.86%

Banks - Diversified Industry

Max
20.93%
Q3
14.73%
Median
12.33%
Q1
9.14%
Min
5.86%

UBS’s Return on Equity of 5.86% is in the lower quartile for the Banks - Diversified industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Life and Banks - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFL

2.99%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.16%
Q1
0.68%
Min
-0.10%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Life industry.

UBS

0.24%

Banks - Diversified Industry

Max
4.52%
Q3
2.95%
Median
1.89%
Q1
0.86%
Min
0.18%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Banks - Diversified industry.

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Life and Banks - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFL

21.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
21.20%
Q3
11.59%
Median
7.10%
Q1
3.79%
Min
2.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.03% places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBS

10.97%

Banks - Diversified Industry

Max
33.40%
Q3
26.40%
Median
19.24%
Q1
14.99%
Min
7.95%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks - Diversified industry, UBS’s Net Profit Margin of 10.97% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Banks - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFL

25.70%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
38.96%
Q3
37.28%
Median
14.06%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-1.68%

In the Insurance - Life industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

UBS

10.68%

Banks - Diversified Industry

Max
50.90%
Q3
37.76%
Median
28.44%
Q1
15.73%
Min
8.60%

UBS’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.68% is in the lower quartile for the Banks - Diversified industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Banks - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFLUBS
Return on Equity (TTM)13.91%5.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%0.33%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.99%0.24%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.03%10.97%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.70%10.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.82%100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFL

--

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
843.97
Q3
821.68
Median
6.06
Q1
3.15
Min
0.47

Current Ratio data for AFL is currently unavailable.

UBS

--

Banks - Diversified Industry

Max
0.67
Q3
0.49
Median
0.39
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

For the Banks - Diversified industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Banks - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFL

0.29

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
0.86
Q3
0.83
Median
0.55
Q1
0.37
Min
0.27

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, AFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UBS

3.86

Banks - Diversified Industry

Max
4.98
Q3
3.65
Median
3.13
Q1
1.73
Min
0.09

UBS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Banks - Diversified industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.86. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Banks - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFL

21.96

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
37.82
Q3
19.50
Median
6.25
Q1
2.29
Min
-0.76

AFL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.96 is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UBS

0.15

Banks - Diversified Industry

Max
0.98
Q3
0.78
Median
0.55
Q1
0.31
Min
0.09

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks - Diversified industry.

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Life and Banks - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFLUBS
Current Ratio (TTM)----
Quick Ratio (TTM)----
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.293.86
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.22
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.5715.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)21.950.15

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFL and UBS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFL

2.07%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
10.36%
Q3
4.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.51%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance - Life industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBS

2.69%

Banks - Diversified Industry

Max
7.73%
Q3
4.16%
Median
3.24%
Q1
2.27%
Min
0.00%

UBS’s Dividend Yield of 2.69% is consistent with its peers in the Banks - Diversified industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Life and Banks - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFL

31.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
203.94%
Q3
64.38%
Median
29.88%
Q1
19.14%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.03% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Life industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBS

0.00%

Banks - Diversified Industry

Max
84.94%
Q3
39.11%
Median
26.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UBS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Banks - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFLUBS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%2.69%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.03%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFL

15.85

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
17.82
Q3
16.08
Median
12.43
Q1
7.33
Min
3.69

AFL’s P/E Ratio of 15.85 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBS

21.95

Banks - Diversified Industry

Max
14.13
Q3
13.37
Median
11.90
Q1
9.29
Min
7.43

At 21.95, UBS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Banks - Diversified industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Banks - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFL

2.40

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.81
Q3
1.95
Median
0.97
Q1
0.53
Min
0.24

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.40 places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

UBS

0.88

Banks - Diversified Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.41
Median
1.15
Q1
0.77
Min
0.45

UBS’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.88 is within the middle range of its peers in the Banks - Diversified industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Banks - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFL

3.31

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.84
Q3
2.89
Median
1.06
Q1
0.63
Min
0.31

AFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.31 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance - Life industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBS

2.40

Banks - Diversified Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.92
Median
2.29
Q1
1.83
Min
0.94

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks - Diversified industry.

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Banks - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFL

2.16

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.87
Q3
2.13
Median
1.49
Q1
0.95
Min
0.38

AFL’s P/B Ratio of 2.16 is in the upper tier for the Insurance - Life industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBS

1.26

Banks - Diversified Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
1.47
Median
1.23
Q1
1.10
Min
0.65

UBS’s P/B Ratio of 1.26 is within the conventional range for the Banks - Diversified industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFL vs. UBS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Banks - Diversified industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFLUBS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)15.8521.95
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.400.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.312.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.161.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)23.1022.15
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)13.4531.23
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.464.64