Seek Returns logo

AFL vs. SFB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFL and SFB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AFL’s market capitalization of 56.54 billion USD is substantially larger than SFB’s 11.03 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.81 for AFL and 1.09 for SFB, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAFLSFB
Company NameAflac IncorporatedStifel Financial Corporation 5.20% Senior Notes due 2047
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - LifeInvestment - Banking & Investment Services
CEODaniel Paul AmosNone
Price104.57 USD21 USD
Market Cap56.54 billion USD11.03 billion USD
Beta0.811.09
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980October 17, 2017
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFL and SFB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFL vs. SFB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFL

13.91%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
23.38%
Q3
14.56%
Median
11.23%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-5.23%

AFL’s Return on Equity of 13.91% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Life industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SFB

11.33%

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
9.82%
Median
6.95%
Q1
1.70%
Min
-7.08%

In the upper quartile for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry, SFB’s Return on Equity of 11.33% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Life and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFL

2.99%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.16%
Q1
0.68%
Min
-0.10%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Life industry.

SFB

2.76%

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
9.59%
Q3
7.88%
Median
1.38%
Q1
-3.64%
Min
-7.80%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry.

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Life and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFL

21.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
21.20%
Q3
11.59%
Median
7.10%
Q1
3.79%
Min
2.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.03% places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SFB

11.29%

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
30.83%
Median
9.16%
Q1
-2.60%
Min
-38.28%

SFB’s Net Profit Margin of 11.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFL

25.70%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
38.96%
Q3
37.28%
Median
14.06%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-1.68%

In the Insurance - Life industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

SFB

24.92%

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
81.43%
Q3
42.20%
Median
12.51%
Q1
-8.30%
Min
-22.17%

SFB’s Operating Profit Margin of 24.92% is around the midpoint for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFLSFB
Return on Equity (TTM)13.91%11.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%1.56%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.99%2.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.03%11.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.70%24.92%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.82%81.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFL

--

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
843.97
Q3
821.68
Median
6.06
Q1
3.15
Min
0.47

Current Ratio data for AFL is currently unavailable.

SFB

--

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
1.42
Median
0.81
Q1
0.28
Min
0.03

Current Ratio data for SFB is currently unavailable.

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFL

0.29

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
0.86
Q3
0.83
Median
0.55
Q1
0.37
Min
0.27

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, AFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SFB

0.27

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
1.86
Q3
1.69
Median
1.12
Q1
0.65
Min
0.27

Falling into the lower quartile for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry, SFB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFL

21.96

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
37.82
Q3
19.50
Median
6.25
Q1
2.29
Min
-0.76

AFL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.96 is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SFB

1.88

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
10.11
Q3
5.15
Median
1.31
Q1
-0.12
Min
-0.75

SFB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Life and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFLSFB
Current Ratio (TTM)----
Quick Ratio (TTM)----
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.290.27
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.04
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.57-0.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)21.951.88

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFL and SFB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFL

2.07%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
10.36%
Q3
4.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.51%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance - Life industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SFB

1.61%

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
8.37%
Q3
8.00%
Median
7.73%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.00%

SFB’s Dividend Yield of 1.61% is in the lower quartile for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Life and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFL

31.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
203.94%
Q3
64.38%
Median
29.88%
Q1
19.14%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.03% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Life industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SFB

47.45%

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
116.00%
Q3
105.02%
Median
47.45%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SFB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 47.45% is within the typical range for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFLSFB
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%1.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.03%47.45%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFL

15.85

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
17.82
Q3
16.08
Median
12.43
Q1
7.33
Min
3.69

AFL’s P/E Ratio of 15.85 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SFB

18.43

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
17.50
Q3
15.38
Median
13.59
Q1
9.39
Min
0.41

At 18.43, SFB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFL

2.40

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.81
Q3
1.95
Median
0.97
Q1
0.53
Min
0.24

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.40 places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

SFB

0.79

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
5.52
Q3
5.29
Median
5.05
Q1
2.90
Min
0.75

In the lower quartile for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry, SFB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.79 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFL

3.31

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.84
Q3
2.89
Median
1.06
Q1
0.63
Min
0.31

AFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.31 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance - Life industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SFB

2.04

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
6.72
Q3
5.60
Median
3.30
Q1
1.69
Min
0.00

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry.

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFL

2.16

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.87
Q3
2.13
Median
1.49
Q1
0.95
Min
0.38

AFL’s P/B Ratio of 2.16 is in the upper tier for the Insurance - Life industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SFB

2.01

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
1.91
Q3
1.39
Median
1.21
Q1
0.97
Min
0.90

At 2.01, SFB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AFL vs. SFB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFLSFB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)15.8518.43
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.400.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.312.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.162.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)23.1045.93
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)13.456.94
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.461.79