Seek Returns logo

AFL vs. SEIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFL and SEIC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AFL’s market capitalization of 56.54 billion USD is substantially larger than SEIC’s 11.59 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.81 for AFL and 0.91 for SEIC, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAFLSEIC
Company NameAflac IncorporatedSEI Investments Company
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - LifeAsset Management
CEODaniel Paul AmosRyan P. Hicke
Price104.57 USD93.1 USD
Market Cap56.54 billion USD11.59 billion USD
Beta0.810.91
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980March 25, 1981
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFL and SEIC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFL vs. SEIC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFL

13.91%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
23.38%
Q3
14.56%
Median
11.23%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-5.23%

AFL’s Return on Equity of 13.91% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Life industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SEIC

26.40%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
18.22%
Median
11.24%
Q1
5.81%
Min
-5.72%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry, SEIC’s Return on Equity of 26.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Life and Asset Management industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFL

2.99%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.16%
Q1
0.68%
Min
-0.10%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Life industry.

SEIC

19.62%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
20.06%
Median
8.68%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-16.42%

SEIC’s Return on Invested Capital of 19.62% is in line with the norm for the Asset Management industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Life and Asset Management industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFL

21.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
21.20%
Q3
11.59%
Median
7.10%
Q1
3.79%
Min
2.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.03% places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SEIC

27.78%

Asset Management Industry

Max
91.66%
Q3
57.81%
Median
29.48%
Q1
15.70%
Min
-27.65%

SEIC’s Net Profit Margin of 27.78% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Asset Management industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFL

25.70%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
38.96%
Q3
37.28%
Median
14.06%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-1.68%

In the Insurance - Life industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

SEIC

26.93%

Asset Management Industry

Max
99.76%
Q3
78.28%
Median
34.76%
Q1
21.75%
Min
-48.25%

SEIC’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.93% is around the midpoint for the Asset Management industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Asset Management industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFLSEIC
Return on Equity (TTM)13.91%26.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%23.43%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.99%19.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.03%27.78%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.70%26.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.82%53.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFL

--

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
843.97
Q3
821.68
Median
6.06
Q1
3.15
Min
0.47

Current Ratio data for AFL is currently unavailable.

SEIC

5.66

Asset Management Industry

Max
12.44
Q3
5.76
Median
3.04
Q1
1.03
Min
0.01

SEIC’s Current Ratio of 5.66 aligns with the median group of the Asset Management industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Asset Management industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFL

0.29

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
0.86
Q3
0.83
Median
0.55
Q1
0.37
Min
0.27

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, AFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SEIC

0.01

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.42
Median
0.76
Q1
0.34
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, SEIC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Asset Management industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFL

21.96

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
37.82
Q3
19.50
Median
6.25
Q1
2.29
Min
-0.76

AFL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.96 is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SEIC

1,374.97

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
6.30
Median
2.71
Q1
1.00
Min
-6.91

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 1,374.97, SEIC demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Asset Management industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Life and Asset Management industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFLSEIC
Current Ratio (TTM)--5.66
Quick Ratio (TTM)--5.66
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.290.01
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.01
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.57-0.92
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)21.951374.97

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFL and SEIC. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFL

2.07%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
10.36%
Q3
4.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.51%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance - Life industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SEIC

1.05%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.09%
Q3
11.60%
Median
6.37%
Q1
2.75%
Min
0.00%

SEIC’s Dividend Yield of 1.05% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Life and Asset Management industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFL

31.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
203.94%
Q3
64.38%
Median
29.88%
Q1
19.14%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.03% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Life industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SEIC

9.98%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
127.70%
Median
75.15%
Q1
34.21%
Min
0.00%

SEIC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.98% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Asset Management industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFLSEIC
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%1.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.03%9.98%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFL

15.85

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
17.82
Q3
16.08
Median
12.43
Q1
7.33
Min
3.69

AFL’s P/E Ratio of 15.85 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SEIC

19.60

Asset Management Industry

Max
38.72
Q3
23.40
Median
11.45
Q1
8.80
Min
1.54

SEIC’s P/E Ratio of 19.60 is within the middle range for the Asset Management industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Asset Management industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFL

2.40

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.81
Q3
1.95
Median
0.97
Q1
0.53
Min
0.24

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.40 places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

SEIC

1.68

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.23
Median
1.55
Q1
0.89
Min
0.02

SEIC’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.68 is within the middle range of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Asset Management industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFL

3.31

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.84
Q3
2.89
Median
1.06
Q1
0.63
Min
0.31

AFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.31 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance - Life industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SEIC

5.35

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
7.92
Median
4.87
Q1
3.51
Min
0.02

SEIC’s P/S Ratio of 5.35 aligns with the market consensus for the Asset Management industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Asset Management industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFL

2.16

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.87
Q3
2.13
Median
1.49
Q1
0.95
Min
0.38

AFL’s P/B Ratio of 2.16 is in the upper tier for the Insurance - Life industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SEIC

5.22

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.33
Q3
2.75
Median
1.06
Q1
0.87
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

AFL vs. SEIC: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Asset Management industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFLSEIC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)15.8519.60
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.401.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.315.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.165.22
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)23.1019.21
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)13.4514.65
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.465.04