Seek Returns logo

AFL vs. RZB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFL and RZB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AFL’s market capitalization of 56.54 billion USD is substantially larger than RZB’s 13.07 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.81 for AFL and 0.63 for RZB, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAFLRZB
Company NameAflac IncorporatedReinsurance Group of America, Incorporated
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - LifeInsurance - Reinsurance
CEODaniel Paul AmosTony Cheng
Price104.57 USD24.78 USD
Market Cap56.54 billion USD13.07 billion USD
Beta0.810.63
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980June 13, 2016
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFL and RZB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFL vs. RZB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFL

13.91%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
23.38%
Q3
14.56%
Median
11.23%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-5.23%

AFL’s Return on Equity of 13.91% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Life industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RZB

7.36%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
18.30%
Q3
14.16%
Median
8.39%
Q1
7.08%
Min
5.91%

RZB’s Return on Equity of 7.36% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFL

2.99%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.16%
Q1
0.68%
Min
-0.10%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Life industry.

RZB

0.62%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
126.30%
Q3
60.66%
Median
7.25%
Q1
3.18%
Min
0.62%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFL

21.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
21.20%
Q3
11.59%
Median
7.10%
Q1
3.79%
Min
2.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.03% places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RZB

3.77%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
21.27%
Q3
12.90%
Median
9.40%
Q1
5.62%
Min
3.77%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry, RZB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.77% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFL

25.70%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
38.96%
Q3
37.28%
Median
14.06%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-1.68%

In the Insurance - Life industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

RZB

5.12%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
17.83%
Q3
15.41%
Median
8.11%
Q1
5.86%
Min
4.12%

RZB’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.12% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFLRZB
Return on Equity (TTM)13.91%7.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%0.62%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.99%0.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.03%3.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.70%5.12%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.82%73.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFL

--

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
843.97
Q3
821.68
Median
6.06
Q1
3.15
Min
0.47

Current Ratio data for AFL is currently unavailable.

RZB

--

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

Current Ratio data for RZB is currently unavailable.

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFL

0.29

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
0.86
Q3
0.83
Median
0.55
Q1
0.37
Min
0.27

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, AFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RZB

0.50

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

RZB has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50, but industry benchmarks for the Insurance - Reinsurance sector are currently unavailable for comparison.

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFL

21.96

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
37.82
Q3
19.50
Median
6.25
Q1
2.29
Min
-0.76

AFL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.96 is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

RZB

3.41

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
22.46
Q3
18.27
Median
5.57
Q1
4.93
Min
3.41

In the lower quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry, RZB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFLRZB
Current Ratio (TTM)----
Quick Ratio (TTM)----
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.290.50
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.04
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.570.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)21.953.41

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFL and RZB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFL

2.07%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
10.36%
Q3
4.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.51%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance - Life industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RZB

1.80%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
2.38%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.33%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.80%, RZB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance - Reinsurance industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFL

31.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
203.94%
Q3
64.38%
Median
29.88%
Q1
19.14%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.03% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Life industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RZB

29.26%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
40.35%
Q3
23.76%
Median
7.09%
Q1
1.73%
Min
0.00%

RZB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.26% is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFLRZB
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%1.80%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.03%29.26%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFL

15.85

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
17.82
Q3
16.08
Median
12.43
Q1
7.33
Min
3.69

AFL’s P/E Ratio of 15.85 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RZB

16.46

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
16.92
Q3
16.06
Median
12.86
Q1
8.23
Min
5.12

A P/E Ratio of 16.46 places RZB in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFL

2.40

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.81
Q3
1.95
Median
0.97
Q1
0.53
Min
0.24

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.40 places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

RZB

1.52

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
1.04
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.20

RZB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.52 is exceptionally high for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFL

3.31

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.84
Q3
2.89
Median
1.06
Q1
0.63
Min
0.31

AFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.31 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance - Life industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RZB

0.62

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
1.07
Median
0.91
Q1
0.83
Min
0.62

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFL

2.16

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.87
Q3
2.13
Median
1.49
Q1
0.95
Min
0.38

AFL’s P/B Ratio of 2.16 is in the upper tier for the Insurance - Life industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

RZB

1.15

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
1.18
Median
1.08
Q1
0.93
Min
0.73

RZB’s P/B Ratio of 1.15 is within the conventional range for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFL vs. RZB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFLRZB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)15.8516.46
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.401.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.310.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.161.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)23.102.58
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)13.4512.68
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.460.65