Seek Returns logo

AFL vs. RKT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFL and RKT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAFLRKT
Company NameAflac IncorporatedRocket Companies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryInsuranceFinancial Services
Market Capitalization57.45 billion USD38.16 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980August 6, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFL and RKT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFL vs. RKT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFLRKT
5-Day Price Return-0.72%2.84%
13-Week Price Return3.87%38.12%
26-Week Price Return5.14%36.45%
52-Week Price Return-0.09%-12.99%
Month-to-Date Return8.10%22.41%
Year-to-Date Return3.84%60.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.75M17.92M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.35M16.55M
3-Month Volatility17.51%59.81%
Beta0.862.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFL

9.33%

Insurance Industry

Max
29.03%
Q3
18.11%
Median
13.90%
Q1
10.42%
Min
-0.64%

AFL’s Return on Equity of 9.33% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

RKT has a negative Return on Equity of -0.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFL

15.32%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.06%
Median
9.15%
Q1
5.48%
Min
-7.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.32% places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

RKT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFL

21.35%

Insurance Industry

Max
35.49%
Q3
19.49%
Median
14.35%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

RKT

13.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

RKT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.77% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFLRKT
Return on Equity (TTM)9.33%-0.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.99%0.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.32%-0.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.35%13.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFL

0.11

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.33
Median
0.55
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

RKT

0.40

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFL

0.33

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

RKT

2.69

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFL

33.57

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
20.84
Median
9.56
Q1
3.34
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

RKT

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFLRKT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.110.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.110.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.332.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)33.572.42

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFL vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFL vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFL

1.98%

Insurance Industry

Max
8.23%
Q3
4.54%
Median
3.42%
Q1
1.97%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Yield of 1.98% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFL

34.55%

Insurance Industry

Max
168.02%
Q3
85.57%
Median
50.71%
Q1
22.04%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 34.55% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFLRKT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.98%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)34.55%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFL

23.65

Insurance Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
17.76
Median
13.63
Q1
10.02
Min
2.89

A P/E Ratio of 23.65 places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

RKT

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

P/E Ratio data for RKT is currently unavailable.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFL

3.62

Insurance Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
0.81
Min
0.23

AFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.62 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RKT

7.31

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFL

2.10

Insurance Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.48
Median
1.68
Q1
1.19
Min
0.19

AFL’s P/B Ratio of 2.10 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RKT

3.81

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

RKT’s P/B Ratio of 3.81 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFLRKT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.65--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.627.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.103.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.2520.65