Seek Returns logo

AFL vs. RKT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFL and RKT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AFL’s market capitalization of 56.54 billion USD is substantially larger than RKT’s 28.48 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

RKT carries a higher beta at 2.28, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AFL (beta: 0.81) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAFLRKT
Company NameAflac IncorporatedRocket Companies, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - LifeFinancial - Mortgages
CEODaniel Paul AmosVarun Krishna
Price104.57 USD14.24 USD
Market Cap56.54 billion USD28.48 billion USD
Beta0.812.28
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980August 6, 2020
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFL and RKT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFL vs. RKT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFL

13.91%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
23.38%
Q3
14.56%
Median
11.23%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-5.23%

AFL’s Return on Equity of 13.91% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Life industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RKT

0.43%

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
13.67%
Q3
8.34%
Median
5.17%
Q1
1.25%
Min
0.43%

RKT’s Return on Equity of 0.43% is in the lower quartile for the Financial - Mortgages industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFL

2.99%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.16%
Q1
0.68%
Min
-0.10%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Life industry.

RKT

0.53%

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
5.70%
Q3
5.19%
Median
3.06%
Q1
1.74%
Min
0.53%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Financial - Mortgages industry.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFL

21.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
21.20%
Q3
11.59%
Median
7.10%
Q1
3.79%
Min
2.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.03% places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RKT

0.05%

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
23.74%
Q3
12.13%
Median
3.31%
Q1
0.50%
Min
-8.40%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial - Mortgages industry, RKT’s Net Profit Margin of 0.05% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFL

25.70%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
38.96%
Q3
37.28%
Median
14.06%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-1.68%

In the Insurance - Life industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

RKT

2.89%

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
52.12%
Q3
29.77%
Median
12.64%
Q1
9.22%
Min
2.89%

In the Financial - Mortgages industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFLRKT
Return on Equity (TTM)13.91%0.43%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%0.01%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.99%0.53%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.03%0.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.70%2.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.82%90.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFL

--

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
843.97
Q3
821.68
Median
6.06
Q1
3.15
Min
0.47

Current Ratio data for AFL is currently unavailable.

RKT

0.43

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
1.28
Median
0.56
Q1
0.42
Min
0.18

For the Financial - Mortgages industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFL

0.29

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
0.86
Q3
0.83
Median
0.55
Q1
0.37
Min
0.27

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, AFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RKT

25.35

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
28.70
Q3
26.19
Median
12.98
Q1
1.97
Min
0.28

RKT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 25.35 is typical for the Financial - Mortgages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFL

21.96

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
37.82
Q3
19.50
Median
6.25
Q1
2.29
Min
-0.76

AFL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.96 is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

RKT

0.30

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
1.23
Median
0.75
Q1
0.30
Min
0.30

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial - Mortgages industry.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFLRKT
Current Ratio (TTM)--0.43
Quick Ratio (TTM)--0.43
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.2925.35
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.59
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.5751.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)21.950.30

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFL and RKT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFL

2.07%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
10.36%
Q3
4.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.51%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance - Life industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RKT

5.62%

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
9.76%
Q3
3.44%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.62%, RKT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Financial - Mortgages industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFL

31.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
203.94%
Q3
64.38%
Median
29.88%
Q1
19.14%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.03% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Life industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RKT

0.00%

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
809.09%
Q3
90.46%
Median
3.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFLRKT
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%5.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.03%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFL

15.85

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
17.82
Q3
16.08
Median
12.43
Q1
7.33
Min
3.69

AFL’s P/E Ratio of 15.85 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RKT

758.84

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
27.35
Q3
24.60
Median
19.38
Q1
13.85
Min
9.11

At 758.84, RKT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial - Mortgages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFL

2.40

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.81
Q3
1.95
Median
0.97
Q1
0.53
Min
0.24

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.40 places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

RKT

16.55

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
1.67
Median
0.90
Q1
0.60
Min
0.34

RKT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 16.55 is exceptionally high for the Financial - Mortgages industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFL

3.31

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.84
Q3
2.89
Median
1.06
Q1
0.63
Min
0.31

AFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.31 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance - Life industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RKT

5.62

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
5.61
Q3
3.48
Median
1.83
Q1
0.79
Min
0.28

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial - Mortgages industry.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFL

2.16

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.87
Q3
2.13
Median
1.49
Q1
0.95
Min
0.38

AFL’s P/B Ratio of 2.16 is in the upper tier for the Insurance - Life industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

RKT

3.60

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
1.94
Q3
1.80
Median
1.23
Q1
1.05
Min
0.58

At 3.60, RKT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial - Mortgages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AFL vs. RKT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFLRKT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)15.85758.84
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.4016.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.315.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.163.60
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)23.10-22.66
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)13.45161.45
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.468.26