AFL vs. PNC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and PNC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AFL at 55.98 billion USD and PNC at 68.14 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 0.83 for AFL and 1.06 for PNC, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AFL | PNC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Banks - Regional |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. William S. Demchak |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 172.27 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 68.14 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.83 | 1.06 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | November 17, 1975 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and PNC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and PNC, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AFL | PNC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 11.35 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 3.97 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 3.27 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 1.22 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 11.13 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 1.66 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 5.89 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 20.05 |
Dividend Comparison
PNC stands out with a 3.72% dividend yield—around 78% above AFL’s 2.09%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AFL | PNC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 3.72% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and PNC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.00 and 0.00, both AFL and PNC have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AFL (quick ratio 0.00) and PNC (quick ratio 0.00) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- PNC’s low interest coverage (0.85) means it doesn't cover interest from operating earnings. AFL (at 21.95) meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AFL | PNC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 1.08 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.11 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 0.85 |