AFL vs. MSCI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and MSCI, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AFL at 55.98 billion USD and MSCI at 43.34 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
MSCI carries a higher beta at 1.33, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AFL remains steadier at 0.83.
| Symbol | AFL | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | MSCI Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Henry A. Fernandez |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 560.1 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 43.34 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.83 | 1.33 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | November 15, 2007 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and MSCI over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AFL and MSCI based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- MSCI carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -45.36, indicating negative equity. In contrast, AFL (P/B 2.14) has positive book value.
| Symbol | AFL | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 38.08 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 3.23 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 14.83 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | -45.36 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 30.02 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 26.63 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 16.30 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 33.00 |
Dividend Comparison
AFL’s dividend yield of 2.09% is about 72% higher than MSCI’s 1.21%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AFL | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 1.21% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and MSCI, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.00 and 0.84, both AFL and MSCI have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- AFL’s quick ratio of 0.00 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas MSCI at 0.84 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- MSCI has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -4.87), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas AFL at 0.29 preserves healthier equity coverage.
- MSCI carries a debt-to-assets ratio of 0.87, suggesting substantial asset funding via debt, while AFL at 0.06 opts for a more conservative financing structure.
| Symbol | AFL | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | -4.87 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.87 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 8.46 |