AFL vs. MMC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and MMC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
MMC towers over AFL with a market cap of 112.84 billion USD, roughly 2.02 times the 55.98 billion USD of its peer.
AFL at 0.83 and MMC at 0.85 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | AFL | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Insurance - Brokers |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. John Quinlan Doyle |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 229.01 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 112.84 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.829 | 0.846 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | December 30, 1987 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and MMC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and MMC, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AFL | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 27.88 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 2.56 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 4.51 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 8.01 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 27.01 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 18.87 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 5.34 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 32.00 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AFL at 2.09% and MMC at 1.42% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Their yields align closely, indicating similar income-growth balances.
| Symbol | AFL | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 1.42% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and MMC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AFL posts a current ratio of 0.00 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to MMC, sitting at 1.14, where liabilities are comfortably met.
- AFL’s quick ratio sits at 0.00 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, MMC lands at 1.14, with enough liquidity to spare.
| Symbol | AFL | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 1.59 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.39 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 7.68 |