Seek Returns logo

AFL vs. MMC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFL and MMC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

MMC’s market capitalization of 105.98 billion USD is significantly greater than AFL’s 56.54 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.81 for AFL and 0.83 for MMC, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAFLMMC
Company NameAflac IncorporatedMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - LifeInsurance - Brokers
CEODaniel Paul AmosJohn Quinlan Doyle
Price104.57 USD215.08 USD
Market Cap56.54 billion USD105.98 billion USD
Beta0.810.83
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980December 30, 1987
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFL and MMC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFL vs. MMC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFL

13.91%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
23.38%
Q3
14.56%
Median
11.23%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-5.23%

AFL’s Return on Equity of 13.91% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Life industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MMC

29.68%

Insurance - Brokers Industry

Max
40.40%
Q3
30.52%
Median
22.48%
Q1
4.38%
Min
-5.38%

MMC’s Return on Equity of 29.68% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Brokers industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Brokers industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFL

2.99%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.16%
Q1
0.68%
Min
-0.10%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Life industry.

MMC

11.62%

Insurance - Brokers Industry

Max
11.62%
Q3
11.18%
Median
8.38%
Q1
2.57%
Min
-1.51%

In the upper quartile for the Insurance - Brokers industry, MMC’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.62% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Brokers industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFL

21.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
21.20%
Q3
11.59%
Median
7.10%
Q1
3.79%
Min
2.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.03% places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMC

16.13%

Insurance - Brokers Industry

Max
21.33%
Q3
15.86%
Median
10.63%
Q1
1.06%
Min
-2.28%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.13% places MMC in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Brokers industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Brokers industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFL

25.70%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
38.96%
Q3
37.28%
Median
14.06%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-1.68%

In the Insurance - Life industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

MMC

24.11%

Insurance - Brokers Industry

Max
28.73%
Q3
23.24%
Median
21.46%
Q1
10.89%
Min
5.35%

An Operating Profit Margin of 24.11% places MMC in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Brokers industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Brokers industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFLMMC
Return on Equity (TTM)13.91%29.68%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%7.09%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.99%11.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.03%16.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.70%24.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.82%42.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFL

--

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
843.97
Q3
821.68
Median
6.06
Q1
3.15
Min
0.47

Current Ratio data for AFL is currently unavailable.

MMC

1.14

Insurance - Brokers Industry

Max
1.90
Q3
1.76
Median
1.29
Q1
1.14
Min
1.05

MMC’s Current Ratio of 1.14 falls into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Brokers industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Brokers industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFL

0.29

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
0.86
Q3
0.83
Median
0.55
Q1
0.37
Min
0.27

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, AFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MMC

1.59

Insurance - Brokers Industry

Max
4.59
Q3
2.12
Median
0.59
Q1
0.07
Min
0.01

MMC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.59 is typical for the Insurance - Brokers industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Brokers industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFL

21.96

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
37.82
Q3
19.50
Median
6.25
Q1
2.29
Min
-0.76

AFL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.96 is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MMC

7.68

Insurance - Brokers Industry

Max
29.40
Q3
16.65
Median
7.25
Q1
4.20
Min
1.60

MMC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Insurance - Brokers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Brokers industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFLMMC
Current Ratio (TTM)--1.14
Quick Ratio (TTM)--1.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.291.59
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.39
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.572.94
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)21.957.68

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFL and MMC. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFL

2.07%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
10.36%
Q3
4.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.51%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance - Life industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMC

1.52%

Insurance - Brokers Industry

Max
2.63%
Q3
1.34%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.52%, MMC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance - Brokers industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Brokers industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFL

31.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
203.94%
Q3
64.38%
Median
29.88%
Q1
19.14%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.03% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Life industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMC

38.70%

Insurance - Brokers Industry

Max
45.22%
Q3
39.19%
Median
29.49%
Q1
3.85%
Min
0.00%

MMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.70% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Brokers industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Brokers industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFLMMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%1.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.03%38.70%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFL

15.85

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
17.82
Q3
16.08
Median
12.43
Q1
7.33
Min
3.69

AFL’s P/E Ratio of 15.85 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMC

26.19

Insurance - Brokers Industry

Max
45.50
Q3
35.20
Median
30.00
Q1
28.34
Min
26.42

MMC’s P/E Ratio of 26.19 is below the typical range for the Insurance - Brokers industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Brokers industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFL

2.40

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.81
Q3
1.95
Median
0.97
Q1
0.53
Min
0.24

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.40 places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

MMC

2.49

Insurance - Brokers Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
3.00
Median
2.77
Q1
2.41
Min
2.09

MMC’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.49 is within the middle range of its peers in the Insurance - Brokers industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Brokers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFL

3.31

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.84
Q3
2.89
Median
1.06
Q1
0.63
Min
0.31

AFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.31 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance - Life industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMC

4.23

Insurance - Brokers Industry

Max
7.38
Q3
5.34
Median
4.27
Q1
2.32
Min
0.27

MMC’s P/S Ratio of 4.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance - Brokers industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Brokers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFL

2.16

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.87
Q3
2.13
Median
1.49
Q1
0.95
Min
0.38

AFL’s P/B Ratio of 2.16 is in the upper tier for the Insurance - Life industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MMC

7.52

Insurance - Brokers Industry

Max
10.90
Q3
8.10
Median
6.93
Q1
4.15
Min
1.12

MMC’s P/B Ratio of 7.52 is within the conventional range for the Insurance - Brokers industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFL vs. MMC: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Brokers industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFLMMC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)15.8526.19
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.402.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.314.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.167.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)23.1025.37
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)13.4517.90
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.465.06