AFL vs. MA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and MA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
MA stands out with 513.31 billion USD in market value—about 9.17× AFL’s market cap of 55.98 billion USD.
With betas of 0.83 for AFL and 1.06 for MA, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AFL | MA |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | Mastercard Incorporated |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Financial - Credit Services |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Michael Miebach |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 569.54 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 513.31 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.83 | 1.06 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | May 25, 2006 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and MA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and MA, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AFL | MA |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 39.52 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 2.29 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 17.66 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 77.86 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 33.66 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 30.21 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 18.04 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 34.40 |
Dividend Comparison
AFL’s dividend yield of 2.09% is about 318% higher than MA’s 0.50%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AFL | MA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 0.50% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and MA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AFL’s current ratio of 0.00 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while MA at 1.11 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AFL’s quick ratio of 0.00 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas MA at 1.11 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
| Symbol | AFL | MA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 2.82 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.39 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 32.51 |