AFL vs. KKR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and KKR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
KKR stands out with 104.88 billion USD in market value—about 1.87× AFL’s market cap of 55.98 billion USD.
KKR carries a higher beta at 1.91, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AFL remains steadier at 0.83.
| Symbol | AFL | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | KKR & Co. Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Asset Management |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Joseph Y. Bae |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 117.76 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 104.88 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.83 | 1.91 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | July 15, 2010 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and KKR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and KKR, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AFL | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 47.37 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 1.94 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 6.95 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 3.81 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 13.93 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 16.22 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 9.12 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 18.29 |
Dividend Comparison
AFL’s dividend yield of 2.09% is about 246% higher than KKR’s 0.60%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AFL | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 0.60% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and KKR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AFL’s current ratio of 0.00 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while KKR at 4.11 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AFL’s quick ratio of 0.00 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas KKR at 4.11 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AFL meets its interest obligations (ratio 21.95). In stark contrast, KKR’s negative ratio (-0.04) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | AFL | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 4.11 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 4.11 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 1.85 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.14 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | -0.04 |