AFL vs. ICE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and ICE, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ICE stands out with 100.22 billion USD in market value—about 1.79× AFL’s market cap of 55.98 billion USD.
With betas of 0.83 for AFL and 1.13 for ICE, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AFL | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Jeffrey C. Sprecher |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 174.72 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 100.22 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.83 | 1.13 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | November 16, 2005 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and ICE over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and ICE, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AFL | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 36.02 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 3.14 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 8.32 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 3.59 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 25.30 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 19.57 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 9.97 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 30.31 |
Dividend Comparison
AFL’s dividend yield of 2.09% is about 99% higher than ICE’s 1.05%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AFL | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 1.05% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and ICE, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.00 and 1.00, both AFL and ICE have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- AFL’s quick ratio of 0.00 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ICE at 1.00 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
| Symbol | AFL | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.74 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.14 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 5.12 |