AFL vs. HBAN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and HBAN, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AFL dominates in value with a market cap of 55.98 billion USD, eclipsing HBAN’s 22.32 billion USD by roughly 2.51×.
With betas of 0.83 for AFL and 0.92 for HBAN, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
Symbol | AFL | HBAN |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | Huntington Bancshares Incorporated |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
Industry | Insurance - Life | Banks - Regional |
CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Stephen D. Steinour |
Price | 103.54 USD | 15.32 USD |
Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 22.32 billion USD |
Beta | 0.83 | 0.92 |
Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and HBAN over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and HBAN, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | AFL | HBAN |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 10.88 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 1.00 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 2.96 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 1.09 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 11.58 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 17.93 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 5.21 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 20.41 |
Dividend Comparison
HBAN stands out with a 4.05% dividend yield—around 94% above AFL’s 2.09%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
Symbol | AFL | HBAN |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 4.05% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and HBAN, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AFL’s current ratio of 0.00 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while HBAN at 44.33 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AFL’s quick ratio of 0.00 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas HBAN at 44.33 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- HBAN’s low interest coverage (0.44) means it doesn't cover interest from operating earnings. AFL (at 21.95) meets its interest obligations.
Symbol | AFL | HBAN |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 44.33 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 44.33 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.91 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.09 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 0.44 |