AFL vs. COF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and COF, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
COF stands out with 119.66 billion USD in market value—about 2.14× AFL’s market cap of 55.98 billion USD.
With betas of 0.83 for AFL and 1.14 for COF, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AFL | COF |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | Capital One Financial Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Financial - Credit Services |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Richard D. Fairbank |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 186.93 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 119.66 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.83 | 1.14 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | November 16, 1994 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and COF over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and COF, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AFL | COF |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 14.69 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 2.41 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 2.56 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 1.13 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 7.06 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 18.07 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 3.45 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 9.52 |
Dividend Comparison
AFL’s dividend yield of 2.09% is about 117% higher than COF’s 0.96%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AFL | COF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 0.96% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and COF, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.00 and 0.00, both AFL and COF have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AFL (quick ratio 0.00) and COF (quick ratio 0.00) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- COF’s low interest coverage (0.54) means it doesn't cover interest from operating earnings. AFL (at 21.95) meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AFL | COF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.66 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.08 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 0.54 |