AFL vs. CNA: Aflac vs. CNA Financial Stock Comparison
How do Aflac (AFL) and CNA Financial (CNA) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Aflac (AFL) and CNA Financial (CNA) both belong to the Insurance industry, though AFL is classified under Life & Health Insurance while CNA falls under Property & Casualty Insurance.
| Profile Item | AFL | CNA |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Aflac Incorporated | CNA Financial Corporation Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Life & Health Insurance | Property & Casualty Insurance |
| Market Capitalization | 61.36 billion USD | 12.81 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | AFL | CNA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 12.21% | 13.42% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 18.21% | 15.22% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 20.06% | 9.00% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | AFL | CNA |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 17.13% | 20.85% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 0.22 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -19.86% | -25.67% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.93M | 454.06K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | AFL | CNA |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.46 | 0.44 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.68 | 0.62 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Aflac (AFL) at 12.17% and CNA Financial (CNA) at 9.56% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
AFL
Insurance industry group
12.17%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- AFL
- 12.17%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
CNA
Insurance industry group
9.56%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- CNA
- 9.56%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
Net Margin (TTM)
Aflac (AFL) at 21.24% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of CNA Financial (CNA) at 6.80%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
AFL
Insurance industry group
21.24%
- Max
- 29.92%
- AFL
- 21.24%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
CNA
Insurance industry group
6.80%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- Median
- 10.97%
- CNA
- 6.80%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Aflac (AFL) in Insurance and CNA Financial (CNA) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | AFL | CNA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 12.17% | 9.56% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.39% | 1.29% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 21.24% | 6.80% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
CNA Financial (CNA) at 5.10% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Aflac (AFL) at -9.27% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
CNA Financial (CNA) at 33.24% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Aflac (AFL) at -29.18% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | AFL | CNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -9.27% | 5.10% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -3.23% | 7.36% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -29.18% | 33.24% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.53% | 12.66% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Aflac (AFL) in Insurance and CNA Financial (CNA) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Aflac (AFL) in Insurance and CNA Financial (CNA) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | AFL | CNA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
CNA Financial (CNA) at 3.95% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Aflac (AFL) at 1.91% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CNA the richer one.
AFL
Insurance industry group
1.91%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- AFL
- 1.91%
- Median
- 0.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CNA
Insurance industry group
3.95%
- Max
- 5.12%
- CNA
- 3.95%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- Median
- 0.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Aflac (AFL) at 35.18% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while CNA Financial (CNA) at 50.26% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
AFL
Insurance industry group
35.18%
- Max
- 76.67%
- AFL
- 35.18%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CNA
Insurance industry group
50.26%
- Max
- 76.67%
- CNA
- 50.26%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | AFL | CNA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.91% | 3.95% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 35.18% | 50.26% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Aflac (AFL) at 18.11 and CNA Financial (CNA) at 12.52 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
AFL
Insurance industry group
18.11
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- AFL
- 18.11
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
CNA
Insurance industry group
12.52
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- CNA
- 12.52
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
P/S Ratio (TTM)
CNA Financial (CNA) at 0.84 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Aflac (AFL) at 3.70 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
AFL
Insurance industry group
3.70
- Max
- 4.03
- AFL
- 3.70
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
CNA
Insurance industry group
0.84
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- CNA
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Aflac (AFL) at 2.10 and CNA Financial (CNA) at 1.25 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
AFL
Insurance industry group
2.10
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- AFL
- 2.10
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
CNA
Insurance industry group
1.25
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- CNA
- 1.25
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AFL | CNA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 18.11 | 12.52 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.70 | 0.84 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.10 | 1.25 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |