Seek Returns logo

AFL vs. CNA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFL and CNA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AFL’s market capitalization of 56.54 billion USD is substantially larger than CNA’s 12.36 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

AFL’s beta of 0.81 points to significantly higher volatility compared to CNA (beta: 0.52), suggesting AFL has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAFLCNA
Company NameAflac IncorporatedCNA Financial Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - LifeInsurance - Property & Casualty
CEODaniel Paul AmosDouglas Merle Worman
Price104.57 USD45.69 USD
Market Cap56.54 billion USD12.36 billion USD
Beta0.810.52
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980February 3, 1969
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFL and CNA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFL vs. CNA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFL

13.91%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
23.38%
Q3
14.56%
Median
11.23%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-5.23%

AFL’s Return on Equity of 13.91% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Life industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CNA

8.64%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
28.14%
Q3
17.51%
Median
12.75%
Q1
8.26%
Min
0.61%

CNA’s Return on Equity of 8.64% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFL

2.99%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.16%
Q1
0.68%
Min
-0.10%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Life industry.

CNA

-39.52%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.89%
Q3
10.09%
Median
3.90%
Q1
0.89%
Min
-7.26%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFL

21.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
21.20%
Q3
11.59%
Median
7.10%
Q1
3.79%
Min
2.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.03% places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CNA

6.23%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.98%
Q3
13.09%
Median
9.18%
Q1
6.10%
Min
2.13%

CNA’s Net Profit Margin of 6.23% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFL

25.70%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
38.96%
Q3
37.28%
Median
14.06%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-1.68%

In the Insurance - Life industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CNA

5.91%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
31.70%
Q3
17.32%
Median
12.57%
Q1
7.38%
Min
4.31%

CNA’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.91% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFLCNA
Return on Equity (TTM)13.91%8.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%1.33%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.99%-39.52%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.03%6.23%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.70%5.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.82%94.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFL

--

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
843.97
Q3
821.68
Median
6.06
Q1
3.15
Min
0.47

Current Ratio data for AFL is currently unavailable.

CNA

0.41

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
51.52
Q3
30.84
Median
20.50
Q1
6.61
Min
0.41

CNA’s Current Ratio of 0.41 falls into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFL

0.29

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
0.86
Q3
0.83
Median
0.55
Q1
0.37
Min
0.27

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, AFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CNA

0.29

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
0.58
Q3
0.36
Median
0.27
Q1
0.14
Min
0.01

CNA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFL

21.96

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
37.82
Q3
19.50
Median
6.25
Q1
2.29
Min
-0.76

AFL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.96 is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CNA

6.54

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
39.40
Q3
22.24
Median
12.38
Q1
6.68
Min
-12.40

In the lower quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, CNA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFLCNA
Current Ratio (TTM)--0.41
Quick Ratio (TTM)--0.41
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.290.29
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.04
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.572.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)21.956.54

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFL and CNA. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFL

2.07%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
10.36%
Q3
4.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.51%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance - Life industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CNA

8.32%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.10%
Median
1.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CNA’s Dividend Yield of 8.32% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFL

31.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
203.94%
Q3
64.38%
Median
29.88%
Q1
19.14%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.03% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Life industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CNA

115.20%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
115.20%
Q3
35.27%
Median
22.19%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.00%

CNA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 115.20% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFLCNA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%8.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.03%115.20%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFL

15.85

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
17.82
Q3
16.08
Median
12.43
Q1
7.33
Min
3.69

AFL’s P/E Ratio of 15.85 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CNA

13.85

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
35.83
Q3
23.28
Median
14.49
Q1
11.91
Min
4.47

CNA’s P/E Ratio of 13.85 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFL

2.40

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.81
Q3
1.95
Median
0.97
Q1
0.53
Min
0.24

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.40 places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

CNA

-0.17

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
1.90
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

CNA has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.17. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFL

3.31

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.84
Q3
2.89
Median
1.06
Q1
0.63
Min
0.31

AFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.31 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance - Life industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CNA

0.86

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
2.39
Median
1.80
Q1
1.01
Min
0.50

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFL

2.16

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.87
Q3
2.13
Median
1.49
Q1
0.95
Min
0.38

AFL’s P/B Ratio of 2.16 is in the upper tier for the Insurance - Life industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CNA

1.21

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
5.34
Q3
2.95
Median
1.92
Q1
1.31
Min
0.52

CNA’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is in the lower quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AFL vs. CNA: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFLCNA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)15.8513.85
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.40-0.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.310.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.161.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)23.104.73
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)13.4515.92
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.461.03