AFL vs. CME: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and CME, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CME towers over AFL with a market cap of 101.53 billion USD, roughly 1.81 times the 55.98 billion USD of its peer.
AFL rides a wilder wave with a beta of 0.83, hinting at bigger swings than CME’s steadier 0.47.
| Symbol | AFL | CME |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | CME Group Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Terrence A. Duffy |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 281.74 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 101.53 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.829 | 0.466 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | December 6, 2002 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and CME over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and CME, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AFL | CME |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 28.29 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 4.40 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 16.16 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 3.75 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 26.54 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 21.58 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 16.48 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 27.06 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AFL at 2.09% and CME at 3.73% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet CME’s 3.73% yield, 79% above AFL’s 2.09%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while AFL leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
| Symbol | AFL | CME |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 3.73% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and CME, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AFL posts a current ratio of 0.00 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to CME, sitting at 1.02, where liabilities are comfortably met.
- AFL’s quick ratio sits at 0.00 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, CME lands at 1.02, with enough liquidity to spare.
| Symbol | AFL | CME |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.13 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 33.72 |