Seek Returns logo

AFL vs. CHYM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFL and CHYM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAFLCHYM
Company NameAflac IncorporatedChime Financial, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryInsuranceFinancial Services
Market Capitalization60.47 billion USD7.82 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980June 12, 2025
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFL and CHYM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFL vs. CHYM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFLCHYM
5-Day Price Return1.23%0.34%
13-Week Price Return9.90%-33.37%
26-Week Price Return0.55%--
52-Week Price Return-0.41%--
Month-to-Date Return1.23%3.47%
Year-to-Date Return9.31%-43.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.99M3.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.50M3.50M
3-Month Volatility17.26%56.98%
Beta0.682.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFL

9.33%

Insurance Industry

Max
30.96%
Q3
18.76%
Median
14.22%
Q1
10.34%
Min
1.73%

AFL’s Return on Equity of 9.33% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CHYM

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

Return on Equity data for CHYM is currently unavailable.

AFL vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFL

15.32%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.69%
Median
9.87%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-3.51%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.32% places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CHYM

-86.97%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

CHYM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -86.97%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AFL vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFL

21.35%

Insurance Industry

Max
34.52%
Q3
20.17%
Median
14.46%
Q1
9.62%
Min
-2.51%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CHYM

-88.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

CHYM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -88.02%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AFL vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFLCHYM
Return on Equity (TTM)9.33%--
Return on Assets (TTM)1.99%--
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.32%-86.97%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.35%-88.02%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--87.82%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFL

0.11

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.37
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CHYM

4.83

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AFL vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFL

0.33

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

CHYM

0.00

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

AFL vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFL

33.57

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
21.45
Median
9.67
Q1
3.55
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

CHYM

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

AFL vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFLCHYM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.114.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.114.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.330.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)33.57--

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFL vs. CHYM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFL vs. CHYM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFL

1.89%

Insurance Industry

Max
9.80%
Q3
5.18%
Median
3.58%
Q1
2.07%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Yield of 1.89% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CHYM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHYM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFL vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFL

34.55%

Insurance Industry

Max
169.40%
Q3
85.57%
Median
53.26%
Q1
23.68%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 34.55% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CHYM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHYM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFL vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFLCHYM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.89%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)34.55%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFL

24.78

Insurance Industry

Max
30.75
Q3
18.11
Median
12.67
Q1
9.66
Min
2.87

A P/E Ratio of 24.78 places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CHYM

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

P/E Ratio data for CHYM is currently unavailable.

AFL vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFL

3.80

Insurance Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
1.88
Median
1.22
Q1
0.80
Min
0.23

With a P/S Ratio of 3.80, AFL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Insurance industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CHYM

7.47

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

AFL vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFL

2.10

Insurance Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.56
Median
1.88
Q1
1.20
Min
0.17

AFL’s P/B Ratio of 2.10 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CHYM

8.81

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

At 8.81, CHYM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AFL vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFLCHYM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.78--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.807.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.108.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.31--
AFL vs. CHYM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison