AFL vs. BRK-B: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and BRK-B, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
BRK-B stands out with 1,093.60 billion USD in market value—about 19.54× AFL’s market cap of 55.98 billion USD.
With betas of 0.83 for AFL and 0.87 for BRK-B, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AFL | BRK-B |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | Berkshire Hathaway Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Insurance - Diversified |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Warren E. Buffett |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 507.03 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 1,093.60 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.83 | 0.87 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | May 9, 1996 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and BRK-B over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and BRK-B, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AFL | BRK-B |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 13.52 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 2.80 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 2.63 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 1.67 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 90.64 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 10.33 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 2.83 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 97.58 |
Dividend Comparison
AFL delivers a 2.09% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas BRK-B appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AFL | BRK-B |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and BRK-B, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.00 and 0.00, both AFL and BRK-B have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AFL (quick ratio 0.00) and BRK-B (quick ratio 0.00) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
| Symbol | AFL | BRK-B |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.19 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.11 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 34.37 |