AFL vs. BLK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and BLK, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
BLK towers over AFL with a market cap of 150.72 billion USD, roughly 2.69 times the 55.98 billion USD of its peer.
BLK dances to a riskier tune, sporting a beta of 1.43, while AFL keeps it calmer at 0.83.
| Symbol | AFL | BLK |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | BlackRock, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Asset Management |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Laurence Douglas Fink |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 972.83 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 150.72 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.829 | 1.426 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | October 1, 1999 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and BLK over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and BLK, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AFL | BLK |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 23.91 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 1.88 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 7.13 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 3.14 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 37.99 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 19.29 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 7.44 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 39.63 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AFL at 2.09% and BLK at 2.11% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Their yields align closely, indicating similar income-growth balances.
| Symbol | AFL | BLK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 2.11% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and BLK, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AFL posts a current ratio of 0.00 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to BLK, sitting at 12.36, where liabilities are comfortably met.
- AFL’s quick ratio sits at 0.00 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, BLK lands at 12.36, with enough liquidity to spare.
| Symbol | AFL | BLK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 12.36 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 12.36 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.30 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.10 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 16.94 |