AFL vs. BK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and BK, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AFL at 55.98 billion USD and BK at 63.60 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 0.83 for AFL and 1.05 for BK, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AFL | BK |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Asset Management |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Robin Antony Vince |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 88.9 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 63.60 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.83 | 1.05 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | May 3, 1973 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and BK over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and BK, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AFL | BK |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 13.56 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 1.25 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 1.49 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 27.79 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 12.60 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 4.89 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 39.75 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AFL and BK offer similar dividend yields (2.09% vs. 2.11%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | AFL | BK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 2.11% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and BK, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AFL’s current ratio of 0.00 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while BK at 3.22 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AFL’s quick ratio of 0.00 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas BK at 3.22 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- BK’s low interest coverage (0.39) means it doesn't cover interest from operating earnings. AFL (at 21.95) meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AFL | BK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 3.22 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 3.22 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.76 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 0.39 |