AFL vs. ARES: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and ARES, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AFL dominates in value with a market cap of 55.98 billion USD, eclipsing ARES’s 34.18 billion USD by roughly 1.64×.
ARES carries a higher beta at 1.42, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AFL remains steadier at 0.83.
| Symbol | AFL | ARES |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | Ares Management Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Asset Management |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Michael J. Arougheti |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 158.98 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 34.18 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.83 | 1.42 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | May 2, 2014 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and ARES over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and ARES, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AFL | ARES |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 64.72 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 2.92 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 6.95 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 7.47 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 6.22 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 20.91 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 6.97 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 6.23 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AFL and ARES offer similar dividend yields (2.09% vs. 2.46%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | AFL | ARES |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 2.46% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and ARES, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.00 and 0.90, both AFL and ARES have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- AFL’s quick ratio of 0.00 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ARES at 0.90 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
| Symbol | AFL | ARES |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.15 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 1.95 |