AFL vs. APO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and APO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AFL at 55.98 billion USD and APO at 74.68 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
APO carries a higher beta at 1.65, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AFL remains steadier at 0.83.
| Symbol | AFL | APO |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | Apollo Global Management, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Asset Management - Global |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Marc Jeffrey Rowan |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 130.68 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 74.68 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.83 | 1.65 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | March 30, 2011 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and APO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AFL and APO based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- APO shows a negative forward PEG of -0.21, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AFL at 2.37 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | AFL | APO |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 21.36 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | -0.21 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 3.03 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 4.27 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 21.02 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 9.21 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 2.92 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 20.25 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AFL and APO offer similar dividend yields (2.09% vs. 1.45%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | AFL | APO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 1.45% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and APO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.00 and 0.80, both AFL and APO have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AFL (quick ratio 0.00) and APO (quick ratio 0.80) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
| Symbol | AFL | APO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.59 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 21.30 |