AFL vs. AIG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and AIG, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AFL (55.98 billion USD) and AIG (47.62 billion USD) sit neck-and-neck in market cap terms.
AFL at 0.83 and AIG at 0.70 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | AFL | AIG |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | American International Group, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Insurance - Diversified |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Peter Salvatore Zaffino |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 82.63 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 47.62 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.829 | 0.7 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | January 2, 1973 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and AIG over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AFL and AIG based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AIG shows a negative P/E of -30.90, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, AFL at 15.70 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
- AIG has a negative Forward PEG of -1.65, suggesting analysts predict either a drop in earnings or no profits at all in the near future—a red flag for its growth trajectory. Meanwhile, AFL at 2.37 avoids such a pessimistic forecast.
| Symbol | AFL | AIG |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | -30.90 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | -1.65 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 1.75 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 1.43 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 17.65 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 8.68 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 2.01 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 20.32 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AFL at 2.09% and AIG at 1.94% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Their yields align closely, indicating similar income-growth balances.
| Symbol | AFL | AIG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 1.94% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and AIG, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- For both AFL (0.00) and AIG (0.00), current ratios sit below 1. With current assets trailing short-term liabilities, they might tap into cash flow or borrowing to stay afloat—a setup not uncommon in certain sectors, though it bears monitoring if cash gets tight.
- AFL (0.00) and AIG (0.00) both clock quick ratios under 0.8. Without inventory, their liquid assets don’t match short-term debts, so they might lean on sales or loans to cover the difference—doable if cash keeps flowing.
| Symbol | AFL | AIG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.21 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.05 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 8.29 |