Seek Returns logo

AFGB vs. CMSD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFGB and CMSD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

CMSD’s market capitalization of 21.08 billion USD is significantly greater than AFGB’s 10.73 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AFGB’s beta of 0.72 points to significantly higher volatility compared to CMSD (beta: 0.37), suggesting AFGB has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAFGBCMSD
Company NameAmerican Financial Group, Inc.CMS Energy Corporation 5.875% J
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesUtilities
IndustryInsurance - Property & CasualtyRegulated Electric
CEONoneNone
Price21.49 USD22.68 USD
Market Cap10.73 billion USD21.08 billion USD
Beta0.720.37
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateApril 1, 2020February 21, 2019
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFGB and CMSD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFGB vs. CMSD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFGB

17.81%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
28.14%
Q3
17.51%
Median
12.75%
Q1
8.26%
Min
0.61%

In the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, AFGB’s Return on Equity of 17.81% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CMSD

12.49%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
18.07%
Q3
12.49%
Median
10.00%
Q1
8.48%
Min
5.02%

CMSD’s Return on Equity of 12.49% is on par with the norm for the Regulated Electric industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFGB

27.67%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.89%
Q3
10.09%
Median
3.90%
Q1
0.89%
Min
-7.26%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

CMSD

3.85%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
5.26%
Q3
4.57%
Median
3.97%
Q1
3.33%
Min
1.92%

CMSD’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.85% is in line with the norm for the Regulated Electric industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFGB

13.06%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.98%
Q3
13.09%
Median
9.18%
Q1
6.10%
Min
2.13%

AFGB’s Net Profit Margin of 13.06% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CMSD

13.10%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
22.24%
Q3
15.98%
Median
13.10%
Q1
11.03%
Min
3.79%

CMSD’s Net Profit Margin of 13.10% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Regulated Electric industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFGB

14.02%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
31.70%
Q3
17.32%
Median
12.57%
Q1
7.38%
Min
4.31%

AFGB’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.02% is around the midpoint for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CMSD

20.15%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
31.57%
Q3
25.65%
Median
21.93%
Q1
17.87%
Min
8.99%

CMSD’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.15% is around the midpoint for the Regulated Electric industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFGBCMSD
Return on Equity (TTM)17.81%12.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.64%2.81%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)27.67%3.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.06%13.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.02%20.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)69.59%39.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFGB

--

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
51.52
Q3
30.84
Median
20.50
Q1
6.61
Min
0.41

Current Ratio data for AFGB is currently unavailable.

CMSD

1.06

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
1.48
Q3
1.06
Median
0.86
Q1
0.73
Min
0.28

CMSD’s Current Ratio of 1.06 is in the upper quartile for the Regulated Electric industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFGB

0.34

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
0.58
Q3
0.36
Median
0.27
Q1
0.14
Min
0.01

AFGB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CMSD

2.04

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
2.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.65
Q1
1.28
Min
0.27

CMSD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Regulated Electric industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.04. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFGB

11.29

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
39.40
Q3
22.24
Median
12.38
Q1
6.68
Min
-12.40

AFGB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.29 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CMSD

2.19

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
3.07
Q3
2.63
Median
2.41
Q1
2.30
Min
1.87

In the lower quartile for the Regulated Electric industry, CMSD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.19 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFGBCMSD
Current Ratio (TTM)--1.06
Quick Ratio (TTM)--0.84
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.342.04
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.050.47
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.315.38
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.292.19

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFGB and CMSD. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFGB

7.15%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.10%
Median
1.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 7.15%, AFGB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CMSD

3.00%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
6.60%
Q3
4.03%
Median
3.30%
Q1
3.06%
Min
0.00%

CMSD’s Dividend Yield of 3.00% is in the lower quartile for the Regulated Electric industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFGB

94.24%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
115.20%
Q3
35.27%
Median
22.19%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.00%

AFGB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.24% is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CMSD

62.35%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
123.06%
Q3
69.07%
Median
62.27%
Q1
52.66%
Min
0.00%

CMSD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 62.35% is within the typical range for the Regulated Electric industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFGBCMSD
Dividend Yield (TTM)7.15%3.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)94.24%62.35%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFGB

13.36

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
35.83
Q3
23.28
Median
14.49
Q1
11.91
Min
4.47

AFGB’s P/E Ratio of 13.36 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CMSD

20.60

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
26.46
Q3
21.71
Median
19.07
Q1
17.74
Min
12.74

CMSD’s P/E Ratio of 20.60 is within the middle range for the Regulated Electric industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFGB

1.41

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
1.90
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

AFGB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.41 is within the middle range of its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

CMSD

2.72

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
3.10
Median
2.78
Q1
2.34
Min
1.46

CMSD’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.72 is within the middle range of its peers in the Regulated Electric industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFGB

1.74

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
2.39
Median
1.80
Q1
1.01
Min
0.50

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

CMSD

2.71

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
3.88
Q3
3.19
Median
2.68
Q1
1.96
Min
0.27

CMSD’s P/S Ratio of 2.71 aligns with the market consensus for the Regulated Electric industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFGB

2.43

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
5.34
Q3
2.95
Median
1.92
Q1
1.31
Min
0.52

AFGB’s P/B Ratio of 2.43 is within the conventional range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CMSD

2.52

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
2.95
Q3
2.37
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.55

CMSD’s P/B Ratio of 2.52 is in the upper tier for the Regulated Electric industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AFGB vs. CMSD: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFGBCMSD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)13.3620.60
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.412.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.742.71
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.432.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)7.47-24.98
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)16.6812.07
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.774.89