Seek Returns logo

AFG vs. RF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFG and RF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

RF’s market capitalization of 22.29 billion USD is significantly greater than AFG’s 10.64 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.71 for AFG and 0.98 for RF, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAFGRF
Company NameAmerican Financial Group, Inc.Regions Financial Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - Property & CasualtyBanks - Regional
CEOStephen Craig LindnerJohn M. Turner Jr.
Price127.43 USD24.8 USD
Market Cap10.64 billion USD22.29 billion USD
Beta0.710.98
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980March 17, 1980
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFG and RF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFG vs. RF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFG

17.81%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
28.14%
Q3
17.51%
Median
12.75%
Q1
8.26%
Min
0.61%

In the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, AFG’s Return on Equity of 17.81% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RF

11.16%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
19.20%
Q3
11.87%
Median
9.48%
Q1
6.66%
Min
-0.15%

RF’s Return on Equity of 11.16% is on par with the norm for the Banks - Regional industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFG

27.67%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.89%
Q3
10.09%
Median
3.90%
Q1
0.89%
Min
-7.26%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

RF

6.98%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
13.33%
Q3
7.16%
Median
5.31%
Q1
2.87%
Min
-3.49%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Banks - Regional industry.

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFG

13.06%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.98%
Q3
13.09%
Median
9.18%
Q1
6.10%
Min
2.13%

AFG’s Net Profit Margin of 13.06% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RF

21.43%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
32.03%
Q3
21.35%
Median
16.99%
Q1
12.69%
Min
0.27%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.43% places RF in the upper quartile for the Banks - Regional industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFG

14.02%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
31.70%
Q3
17.32%
Median
12.57%
Q1
7.38%
Min
4.31%

AFG’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.02% is around the midpoint for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RF

26.71%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
40.01%
Q3
26.24%
Median
21.14%
Q1
15.85%
Min
1.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.71% places RF in the upper quartile for the Banks - Regional industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFGRF
Return on Equity (TTM)17.81%11.16%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.64%1.26%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)27.67%6.98%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.06%21.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.02%26.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)69.59%70.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFG

--

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
51.52
Q3
30.84
Median
20.50
Q1
6.61
Min
0.41

Current Ratio data for AFG is currently unavailable.

RF

0.29

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
0.39
Q3
0.22
Median
0.15
Q1
0.10
Min
0.01

For the Banks - Regional industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFG

0.34

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
0.58
Q3
0.36
Median
0.27
Q1
0.14
Min
0.01

AFG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RF

0.32

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
0.81
Median
0.42
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

RF’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Banks - Regional industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFG

11.29

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
39.40
Q3
22.24
Median
12.38
Q1
6.68
Min
-12.40

AFG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.29 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RF

1.10

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.84
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
-0.35

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks - Regional industry.

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFGRF
Current Ratio (TTM)--0.29
Quick Ratio (TTM)--0.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.340.32
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.050.04
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.31-3.16
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.291.10

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFG and RF. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFG

7.15%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.10%
Median
1.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 7.15%, AFG offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

RF

4.03%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
11.72%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.00%
Q1
1.68%
Min
0.00%

RF’s Dividend Yield of 4.03% is consistent with its peers in the Banks - Regional industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFG

94.24%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
115.20%
Q3
35.27%
Median
22.19%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.00%

AFG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.24% is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

RF

49.58%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
155.35%
Q3
50.05%
Median
34.14%
Q1
18.61%
Min
0.00%

RF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.58% is within the typical range for the Banks - Regional industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFGRF
Dividend Yield (TTM)7.15%4.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)94.24%49.58%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFG

13.36

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
35.83
Q3
23.28
Median
14.49
Q1
11.91
Min
4.47

AFG’s P/E Ratio of 13.36 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RF

11.15

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
22.32
Q3
15.38
Median
12.31
Q1
10.72
Min
4.30

RF’s P/E Ratio of 11.15 is within the middle range for the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFG

1.41

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
1.90
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

AFG’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.41 is within the middle range of its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

RF

1.17

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.13
Median
1.25
Q1
0.71
Min
0.02

RF’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.17 is within the middle range of its peers in the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFG

1.74

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
2.39
Median
1.80
Q1
1.01
Min
0.50

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

RF

2.37

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.28
Q3
2.76
Median
2.17
Q1
1.71
Min
0.55

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks - Regional industry.

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFG

2.43

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
5.34
Q3
2.95
Median
1.92
Q1
1.31
Min
0.52

AFG’s P/B Ratio of 2.43 is within the conventional range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RF

1.21

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.35
Median
1.09
Q1
0.92
Min
0.33

RF’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Banks - Regional industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFG vs. RF: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFGRF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)13.3611.15
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.411.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.742.37
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.431.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)7.479.97
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)16.685.32
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.771.49