AFG vs. NU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AFG and NU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	AFG	NU
Company Name	American Financial Group, Inc.	Nu Holdings Ltd.
Country	United States	Brazil
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Insurance	Banks
Market Capitalization	11.73 billion USD	76.09 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	December 9, 2021
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFG and NU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFG vs. NU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AFG	NU
5-Day Price Return	-2.44%	-1.25%
13-Week Price Return	6.52%	20.76%
26-Week Price Return	13.83%	20.40%
52-Week Price Return	-2.20%	1.15%
Month-to-Date Return	5.48%	-1.80%
Year-to-Date Return	1.43%	52.70%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.56M	37.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.47M	47.65M
3-Month Volatility	22.52%	32.13%
Beta	0.68	1.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFG

17.63%

Insurance Industry

Max: 31.64%
Q3: 19.22%
Median: 14.77%
Q1: 10.48%
Min: 2.20%

AFG’s Return on Equity of 17.63% is on par with the norm for the Insurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NU

27.49%

Banks Industry

Max: 25.75%
Q3: 15.51%
Median: 11.91%
Q1: 8.65%
Min: -1.41%

NU’s Return on Equity of 27.49% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Banks industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AFG vs. NU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFG

9.70%

Insurance Industry

Max: 28.47%
Q3: 15.63%
Median: 10.40%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -3.51%

AFG’s Net Profit Margin of 9.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NU

17.90%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.60%
Median: 28.95%
Q1: 22.27%
Min: 2.66%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, NU’s Net Profit Margin of 17.90% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AFG vs. NU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFG

12.07%

Insurance Industry

Max: 35.59%
Q3: 21.31%
Median: 14.99%
Q1: 10.34%
Min: -2.51%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

NU

24.64%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.30%
Median: 37.14%
Q1: 28.21%
Min: 12.28%

NU’s Operating Profit Margin of 24.64% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AFG vs. NU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AFG	NU
Return on Equity (TTM)	17.63%	27.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.54%	4.27%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.70%	17.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	12.07%	24.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	43.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFG

9.26

Insurance Industry

Max: 2.64
Q3: 1.19
Median: 0.53
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

NU

0.18

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AFG vs. NU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFG

0.38

Insurance Industry

Max: 1.10
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.35
Q1: 0.23
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

NU

4.18

Banks Industry

Max: 5.78
Q3: 2.55
Median: 0.94
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

AFG vs. NU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFG

14.21

Insurance Industry

Max: 49.59
Q3: 22.05
Median: 9.63
Q1: 3.42
Min: -5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

NU

-0.91

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

AFG vs. NU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AFG	NU
Current Ratio (MRQ)	9.26	0.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	9.26	0.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.38	4.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	14.21	-0.91

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFG vs. NU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFG vs. NU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFG

6.48%

Insurance Industry

Max: 9.43%
Q3: 5.10%
Median: 3.57%
Q1: 2.02%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.48%, AFG offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

NU

0.00%

Banks Industry

Max: 9.92%
Q3: 5.44%
Median: 3.78%
Q1: 2.38%
Min: 0.00%

NU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFG vs. NU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFG

96.49%

Insurance Industry

Max: 169.40%
Q3: 85.57%
Median: 50.55%
Q1: 22.12%
Min: 0.00%

AFG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 96.49% is in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

NU

0.00%

Banks Industry

Max: 135.42%
Q3: 78.13%
Median: 52.54%
Q1: 35.48%
Min: 0.00%

NU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFG vs. NU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AFG	NU
Dividend Yield (TTM)	6.48%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	96.49%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFG

14.89

Insurance Industry

Max: 27.66
Q3: 17.29
Median: 12.59
Q1: 9.86
Min: 3.13

AFG’s P/E Ratio of 14.89 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NU

32.49

Banks Industry

Max: 21.36
Q3: 13.70
Median: 10.55
Q1: 8.08
Min: 2.84

At 32.49, NU’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Banks industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AFG vs. NU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFG

1.44

Insurance Industry

Max: 3.39
Q3: 1.95
Median: 1.25
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.22

AFG’s P/S Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NU

5.82

Banks Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 2.97
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.58
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

AFG vs. NU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFG

2.57

Insurance Industry

Max: 4.36
Q3: 2.47
Median: 1.77
Q1: 1.18
Min: 0.17

AFG’s P/B Ratio of 2.57 is in the upper tier for the Insurance industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NU

6.90

Banks Industry

Max: 2.14
Q3: 1.43
Median: 1.13
Q1: 0.87
Min: 0.25

At 6.90, NU’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Banks industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AFG vs. NU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AFG	NU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	14.89	32.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.44	5.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.57	6.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	9.20	15.70