Seek Returns logo

AFG vs. NMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFG and NMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

NMR’s market capitalization of 19.24 billion USD is significantly greater than AFG’s 10.64 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.71 for AFG and 0.57 for NMR, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

NMR is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AFG, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAFGNMR
Company NameAmerican Financial Group, Inc.Nomura Holdings, Inc.
CountryUSJP
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - Property & CasualtyFinancial - Capital Markets
CEOStephen Craig LindnerKentaro Okuda
Price127.43 USD6.51 USD
Market Cap10.64 billion USD19.24 billion USD
Beta0.710.57
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980December 17, 2001
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFG and NMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFG vs. NMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFG

17.81%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
28.14%
Q3
17.51%
Median
12.75%
Q1
8.26%
Min
0.61%

In the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, AFG’s Return on Equity of 17.81% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NMR

9.87%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
42.02%
Q3
20.69%
Median
13.73%
Q1
3.33%
Min
-21.32%

NMR’s Return on Equity of 9.87% is on par with the norm for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFG

27.67%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.89%
Q3
10.09%
Median
3.90%
Q1
0.89%
Min
-7.26%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

NMR

2.00%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
30.24%
Q3
13.34%
Median
6.20%
Q1
-1.71%
Min
-16.91%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFG

13.06%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.98%
Q3
13.09%
Median
9.18%
Q1
6.10%
Min
2.13%

AFG’s Net Profit Margin of 13.06% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NMR

8.52%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
28.67%
Q3
13.52%
Median
10.47%
Q1
0.24%
Min
-9.55%

NMR’s Net Profit Margin of 8.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFG

14.02%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
31.70%
Q3
17.32%
Median
12.57%
Q1
7.38%
Min
4.31%

AFG’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.02% is around the midpoint for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NMR

11.81%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
56.86%
Q3
25.29%
Median
15.90%
Q1
0.51%
Min
-19.18%

NMR’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.81% is around the midpoint for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFGNMR
Return on Equity (TTM)17.81%9.87%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.64%0.60%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)27.67%2.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.06%8.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.02%11.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)69.59%42.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFG

--

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
51.52
Q3
30.84
Median
20.50
Q1
6.61
Min
0.41

Current Ratio data for AFG is currently unavailable.

NMR

--

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
4.60
Q3
3.24
Median
1.32
Q1
0.96
Min
0.05

For the Financial - Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFG

0.34

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
0.58
Q3
0.36
Median
0.27
Q1
0.14
Min
0.01

AFG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NMR

8.98

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.68
Median
0.37
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.98, NMR operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Financial - Capital Markets industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFG

11.29

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
39.40
Q3
22.24
Median
12.38
Q1
6.68
Min
-12.40

AFG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.29 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NMR

0.21

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
12.71
Q3
7.94
Median
1.92
Q1
0.24
Min
-7.71

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFGNMR
Current Ratio (TTM)----
Quick Ratio (TTM)----
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.348.98
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.050.55
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.3154.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.290.21

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFG and NMR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFG

7.15%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.10%
Median
1.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 7.15%, AFG offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

NMR

5.04%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
5.86%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.04%, NMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Financial - Capital Markets industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFG

94.24%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
115.20%
Q3
35.27%
Median
22.19%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.00%

AFG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.24% is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

NMR

0.00%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
128.06%
Q3
43.11%
Median
12.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NMR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFGNMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)7.15%5.04%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)94.24%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFG

13.36

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
35.83
Q3
23.28
Median
14.49
Q1
11.91
Min
4.47

AFG’s P/E Ratio of 13.36 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NMR

8.10

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
42.65
Q3
29.09
Median
20.52
Q1
14.58
Min
8.28

NMR’s P/E Ratio of 8.10 is below the typical range for the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFG

1.41

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
1.90
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

AFG’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.41 is within the middle range of its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

NMR

4.86

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
4.05
Q3
2.46
Median
1.52
Q1
0.78
Min
0.02

NMR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 4.86 is exceptionally high for the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFG

1.74

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
2.39
Median
1.80
Q1
1.01
Min
0.50

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

NMR

0.69

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.34
Q3
7.63
Median
2.98
Q1
1.50
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFG

2.43

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
5.34
Q3
2.95
Median
1.92
Q1
1.31
Min
0.52

AFG’s P/B Ratio of 2.43 is within the conventional range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NMR

0.79

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.60
Q3
6.00
Median
2.91
Q1
1.84
Min
0.53

NMR’s P/B Ratio of 0.79 is in the lower quartile for the Financial - Capital Markets industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AFG vs. NMR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFGNMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)13.368.10
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.414.86
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.740.69
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.430.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)7.47--
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)16.6860.45
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.777.38