Seek Returns logo

AER vs. ZTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AER and ZTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AER’s market capitalization stands at 20.46 billion USD, while ZTO’s is 14.52 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

AER has a positive beta (1.40), indicating it generally moves with the broader market, whereas ZTO has a negative beta (-0.17), often moving inversely, which can offer diversification or hedging benefits.

ZTO is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AER, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAERZTO
Company NameAerCap Holdings N.V.ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
CountryIECN
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesIntegrated Freight & Logistics
CEOAengus KellyMeisong Lai
Price115.89 USD18.05 USD
Market Cap20.46 billion USD14.52 billion USD
Beta1.40-0.17
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 21, 2006October 27, 2016
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AER and ZTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AER vs. ZTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AER

12.55%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
33.37%
Q3
21.32%
Median
10.48%
Q1
2.04%
Min
-2.71%

AER’s Return on Equity of 12.55% is on par with the norm for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ZTO

15.30%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
37.37%
Q3
30.76%
Median
15.30%
Q1
6.33%
Min
-26.64%

ZTO’s Return on Equity of 15.30% is on par with the norm for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AER

3.17%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
19.57%
Q3
13.92%
Median
5.28%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-10.86%

AER’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.17% is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

ZTO

11.37%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.03%
Q3
12.11%
Median
8.38%
Q1
2.55%
Min
0.79%

ZTO’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.37% is in line with the norm for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AER

26.77%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
26.77%
Q3
17.31%
Median
5.12%
Q1
-0.51%
Min
-19.03%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ZTO

20.76%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.64%
Q3
4.86%
Median
3.72%
Q1
0.61%
Min
0.61%

ZTO’s Net Profit Margin of 20.76% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AER

32.92%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
53.21%
Q3
29.93%
Median
16.64%
Q1
8.88%
Min
-12.57%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.92% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ZTO

26.35%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.80%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.93%
Q1
3.63%
Min
0.83%

ZTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAERZTO
Return on Equity (TTM)12.55%15.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.95%10.07%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.17%11.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.77%20.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.92%26.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.97%29.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AER

3.12

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
7.05
Q3
3.95
Median
1.87
Q1
0.85
Min
0.64

AER’s Current Ratio of 3.12 aligns with the median group of the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZTO

1.05

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.36
Median
1.13
Q1
1.02
Min
0.78

ZTO’s Current Ratio of 1.05 aligns with the median group of the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AER

2.69

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
3.50
Median
2.49
Q1
0.92
Min
0.00

AER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.69 is typical for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ZTO

0.27

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.69
Median
0.45
Q1
0.24
Min
0.16

ZTO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AER

5.50

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.53
Q3
5.33
Median
2.35
Q1
1.41
Min
-1.09

AER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.50 is in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ZTO

36.90

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
19.14
Q3
12.59
Median
6.24
Q1
1.76
Min
0.11

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.90, ZTO demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAERZTO
Current Ratio (TTM)3.121.05
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.061.05
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.690.27
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.640.18
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)8.630.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.5036.90

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AER and ZTO. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AER

0.66%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
1.60%
Median
0.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is consistent with its peers in the Rental & Leasing Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ZTO

3.87%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.46%
Q3
2.50%
Median
1.47%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.87%, ZTO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AER

6.80%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
260.58%
Q3
29.91%
Median
17.33%
Q1
6.80%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.80% is within the typical range for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ZTO

38.37%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
92.20%
Q3
43.42%
Median
30.12%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZTO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.37% is within the typical range for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAERZTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%3.87%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.80%38.37%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AER

9.85

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
32.56
Q3
29.28
Median
17.35
Q1
9.97
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, AER’s P/E Ratio of 9.85 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ZTO

10.91

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
38.34
Q3
27.03
Median
21.39
Q1
15.71
Min
10.86

In the lower quartile for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s P/E Ratio of 10.91 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AER

1.33

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
2.33
Median
1.39
Q1
0.91
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Rental & Leasing Services industry.

ZTO

0.89

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.72
Median
1.10
Q1
0.87
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry.

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AER

2.56

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.16
Median
2.03
Q1
0.60
Min
0.25

AER’s P/S Ratio of 2.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ZTO

2.23

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.22
Q3
1.42
Median
0.94
Q1
0.62
Min
0.30

With a P/S Ratio of 2.23, ZTO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AER

1.22

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
2.65
Median
2.02
Q1
1.37
Min
0.69

AER’s P/B Ratio of 1.22 is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ZTO

1.64

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
9.09
Q3
5.80
Median
3.47
Q1
1.54
Min
0.57

ZTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.64 is within the conventional range for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AER vs. ZTO: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAERZTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)9.8510.91
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.330.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.562.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.221.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-9.8011.05
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)12.548.39
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.222.33