Seek Returns logo

AER vs. WAB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AER and WAB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

WAB’s market capitalization of 36.68 billion USD is significantly greater than AER’s 20.46 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.40 for AER and 1.13 for WAB, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAERWAB
Company NameAerCap Holdings N.V.Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
CountryIEUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesRailroads
CEOAengus KellyRafael Ottoni Santana
Price115.89 USD214.37 USD
Market Cap20.46 billion USD36.68 billion USD
Beta1.401.13
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 21, 2006June 16, 1995
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AER and WAB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AER vs. WAB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AER

12.55%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
33.37%
Q3
21.32%
Median
10.48%
Q1
2.04%
Min
-2.71%

AER’s Return on Equity of 12.55% is on par with the norm for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WAB

10.73%

Railroads Industry

Max
40.80%
Q3
24.36%
Median
18.32%
Q1
11.84%
Min
8.37%

WAB’s Return on Equity of 10.73% is in the lower quartile for the Railroads industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AER

3.17%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
19.57%
Q3
13.92%
Median
5.28%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-10.86%

AER’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.17% is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

WAB

8.17%

Railroads Industry

Max
11.47%
Q3
9.66%
Median
9.08%
Q1
7.36%
Min
4.32%

WAB’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.17% is in line with the norm for the Railroads industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AER

26.77%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
26.77%
Q3
17.31%
Median
5.12%
Q1
-0.51%
Min
-19.03%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WAB

10.53%

Railroads Industry

Max
27.77%
Q3
26.50%
Median
24.33%
Q1
9.34%
Min
4.79%

WAB’s Net Profit Margin of 10.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Railroads industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AER

32.92%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
53.21%
Q3
29.93%
Median
16.64%
Q1
8.88%
Min
-12.57%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.92% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WAB

16.09%

Railroads Industry

Max
41.08%
Q3
37.86%
Median
35.40%
Q1
15.99%
Min
10.85%

WAB’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.09% is around the midpoint for the Railroads industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAERWAB
Return on Equity (TTM)12.55%10.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.95%5.79%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.17%8.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.77%10.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.92%16.09%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.97%31.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AER

3.12

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
7.05
Q3
3.95
Median
1.87
Q1
0.85
Min
0.64

AER’s Current Ratio of 3.12 aligns with the median group of the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WAB

1.34

Railroads Industry

Max
1.97
Q3
1.41
Median
0.85
Q1
0.77
Min
0.62

WAB’s Current Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the median group of the Railroads industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AER

2.69

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
3.50
Median
2.49
Q1
0.92
Min
0.00

AER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.69 is typical for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WAB

0.39

Railroads Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.44
Median
1.19
Q1
0.72
Min
0.39

Falling into the lower quartile for the Railroads industry, WAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AER

5.50

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.53
Q3
5.33
Median
2.35
Q1
1.41
Min
-1.09

AER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.50 is in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

WAB

8.45

Railroads Industry

Max
8.45
Q3
7.16
Median
6.40
Q1
5.53
Min
4.30

WAB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.45 is in the upper quartile for the Railroads industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAERWAB
Current Ratio (TTM)3.121.34
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.060.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.690.39
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.640.21
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)8.631.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.508.45

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AER and WAB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AER

0.66%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
1.60%
Median
0.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is consistent with its peers in the Rental & Leasing Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WAB

0.42%

Railroads Industry

Max
4.30%
Q3
2.64%
Median
2.21%
Q1
1.33%
Min
0.43%

WAB’s Dividend Yield of 0.42% is below the typical range for the Railroads industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AER

6.80%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
260.58%
Q3
29.91%
Median
17.33%
Q1
6.80%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.80% is within the typical range for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WAB

13.29%

Railroads Industry

Max
69.30%
Q3
47.83%
Median
32.93%
Q1
18.85%
Min
13.29%

WAB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.29% is in the lower quartile for the Railroads industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAERWAB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%0.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.80%13.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AER

9.85

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
32.56
Q3
29.28
Median
17.35
Q1
9.97
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, AER’s P/E Ratio of 9.85 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

WAB

33.05

Railroads Industry

Max
26.01
Q3
22.00
Median
19.48
Q1
17.09
Min
16.09

At 33.05, WAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Railroads industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AER

1.33

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
2.33
Median
1.39
Q1
0.91
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Rental & Leasing Services industry.

WAB

3.48

Railroads Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
1.84
Median
1.79
Q1
1.59
Min
1.52

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Railroads industry.

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AER

2.56

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.16
Median
2.03
Q1
0.60
Min
0.25

AER’s P/S Ratio of 2.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WAB

3.49

Railroads Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
5.30
Median
4.55
Q1
2.73
Min
0.42

WAB’s P/S Ratio of 3.49 aligns with the market consensus for the Railroads industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AER

1.22

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
2.65
Median
2.02
Q1
1.37
Min
0.69

AER’s P/B Ratio of 1.22 is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

WAB

3.53

Railroads Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.36
Median
3.70
Q1
1.98
Min
1.00

WAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.53 is within the conventional range for the Railroads industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AER vs. WAB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Railroads industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAERWAB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)9.8533.05
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.333.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.563.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.223.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-9.8024.94
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)12.5419.80
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.223.81