Seek Returns logo

AER vs. UPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AER and UPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

UPS’s market capitalization of 88.18 billion USD is significantly greater than AER’s 20.46 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.40 for AER and 1.19 for UPS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAERUPS
Company NameAerCap Holdings N.V.United Parcel Service, Inc.
CountryIEUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesIntegrated Freight & Logistics
CEOAengus KellyCarol B. Tome
Price115.89 USD104.13 USD
Market Cap20.46 billion USD88.18 billion USD
Beta1.401.19
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 21, 2006November 10, 1999
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AER and UPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AER vs. UPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AER

12.55%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
33.37%
Q3
21.32%
Median
10.48%
Q1
2.04%
Min
-2.71%

AER’s Return on Equity of 12.55% is on par with the norm for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UPS

35.35%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
37.37%
Q3
30.76%
Median
15.30%
Q1
6.33%
Min
-26.64%

In the upper quartile for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s Return on Equity of 35.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AER

3.17%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
19.57%
Q3
13.92%
Median
5.28%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-10.86%

AER’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.17% is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

UPS

12.11%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.03%
Q3
12.11%
Median
8.38%
Q1
2.55%
Min
0.79%

UPS’s Return on Invested Capital of 12.11% is in line with the norm for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AER

26.77%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
26.77%
Q3
17.31%
Median
5.12%
Q1
-0.51%
Min
-19.03%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UPS

6.44%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.64%
Q3
4.86%
Median
3.72%
Q1
0.61%
Min
0.61%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.44% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AER

32.92%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
53.21%
Q3
29.93%
Median
16.64%
Q1
8.88%
Min
-12.57%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.92% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UPS

9.36%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.80%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.93%
Q1
3.63%
Min
0.83%

UPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.36% is around the midpoint for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAERUPS
Return on Equity (TTM)12.55%35.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.95%8.55%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.17%12.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.77%6.44%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.92%9.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.97%19.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AER

3.12

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
7.05
Q3
3.95
Median
1.87
Q1
0.85
Min
0.64

AER’s Current Ratio of 3.12 aligns with the median group of the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UPS

1.09

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.36
Median
1.13
Q1
1.02
Min
0.78

UPS’s Current Ratio of 1.09 aligns with the median group of the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AER

2.69

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
3.50
Median
2.49
Q1
0.92
Min
0.00

AER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.69 is typical for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UPS

1.63

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.69
Median
0.45
Q1
0.24
Min
0.16

UPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.63 is typical for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AER

5.50

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.53
Q3
5.33
Median
2.35
Q1
1.41
Min
-1.09

AER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.50 is in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UPS

9.53

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
19.14
Q3
12.59
Median
6.24
Q1
1.76
Min
0.11

UPS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAERUPS
Current Ratio (TTM)3.121.09
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.061.09
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.691.63
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.640.37
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)8.631.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.509.53

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AER and UPS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AER

0.66%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
1.60%
Median
0.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is consistent with its peers in the Rental & Leasing Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UPS

6.28%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.46%
Q3
2.50%
Median
1.47%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.28%, UPS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AER

6.80%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
260.58%
Q3
29.91%
Median
17.33%
Q1
6.80%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.80% is within the typical range for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UPS

92.20%

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
92.20%
Q3
43.42%
Median
30.12%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 92.20% is in the upper quartile for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAERUPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%6.28%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.80%92.20%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AER

9.85

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
32.56
Q3
29.28
Median
17.35
Q1
9.97
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, AER’s P/E Ratio of 9.85 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UPS

15.11

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
38.34
Q3
27.03
Median
21.39
Q1
15.71
Min
10.86

In the lower quartile for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s P/E Ratio of 15.11 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AER

1.33

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
2.33
Median
1.39
Q1
0.91
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Rental & Leasing Services industry.

UPS

1.15

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.72
Median
1.10
Q1
0.87
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry.

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AER

2.56

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.16
Median
2.03
Q1
0.60
Min
0.25

AER’s P/S Ratio of 2.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UPS

0.97

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.22
Q3
1.42
Median
0.94
Q1
0.62
Min
0.30

UPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AER

1.22

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
2.65
Median
2.02
Q1
1.37
Min
0.69

AER’s P/B Ratio of 1.22 is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

UPS

5.65

Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
9.09
Q3
5.80
Median
3.47
Q1
1.54
Min
0.57

UPS’s P/B Ratio of 5.65 is within the conventional range for the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AER vs. UPS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Integrated Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAERUPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)9.8515.11
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.331.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.560.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.225.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-9.8016.41
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)12.549.12
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.221.20