Seek Returns logo

AER vs. TT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AER and TT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

TT’s market capitalization of 97.55 billion USD is significantly greater than AER’s 20.46 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.40 for AER and 1.17 for TT, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAERTT
Company NameAerCap Holdings N.V.Trane Technologies plc
CountryIEIE
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesConstruction
CEOAengus KellyDavid S. Regnery
Price115.89 USD437.39 USD
Market Cap20.46 billion USD97.55 billion USD
Beta1.401.17
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 21, 2006March 17, 1980
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AER and TT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AER vs. TT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AER

12.55%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
33.37%
Q3
21.32%
Median
10.48%
Q1
2.04%
Min
-2.71%

AER’s Return on Equity of 12.55% is on par with the norm for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TT

37.12%

Construction Industry

Max
40.76%
Q3
26.03%
Median
16.38%
Q1
5.66%
Min
-4.01%

In the upper quartile for the Construction industry, TT’s Return on Equity of 37.12% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Construction industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AER

3.17%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
19.57%
Q3
13.92%
Median
5.28%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-10.86%

AER’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.17% is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

TT

20.43%

Construction Industry

Max
27.38%
Q3
15.45%
Median
9.91%
Q1
5.86%
Min
2.28%

In the upper quartile for the Construction industry, TT’s Return on Invested Capital of 20.43% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Construction industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AER

26.77%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
26.77%
Q3
17.31%
Median
5.12%
Q1
-0.51%
Min
-19.03%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TT

13.47%

Construction Industry

Max
24.94%
Q3
14.61%
Median
10.07%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-9.49%

TT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.47% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Construction industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AER

32.92%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
53.21%
Q3
29.93%
Median
16.64%
Q1
8.88%
Min
-12.57%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.92% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TT

18.15%

Construction Industry

Max
24.04%
Q3
19.17%
Median
13.63%
Q1
7.69%
Min
-7.88%

TT’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.15% is around the midpoint for the Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Construction industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAERTT
Return on Equity (TTM)12.55%37.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.95%13.60%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.17%20.43%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.77%13.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.92%18.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.97%35.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AER

3.12

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
7.05
Q3
3.95
Median
1.87
Q1
0.85
Min
0.64

AER’s Current Ratio of 3.12 aligns with the median group of the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TT

1.09

Construction Industry

Max
4.22
Q3
2.59
Median
1.84
Q1
1.44
Min
0.96

TT’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Construction industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Construction industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AER

2.69

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
3.50
Median
2.49
Q1
0.92
Min
0.00

AER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.69 is typical for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TT

0.64

Construction Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
1.15
Median
0.84
Q1
0.56
Min
0.05

TT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Construction industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Construction industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AER

5.50

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.53
Q3
5.33
Median
2.35
Q1
1.41
Min
-1.09

AER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.50 is in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TT

15.46

Construction Industry

Max
30.91
Q3
15.60
Median
7.16
Q1
2.73
Min
-4.26

TT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.46 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Construction industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAERTT
Current Ratio (TTM)3.121.09
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.060.74
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.690.64
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.640.24
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)8.630.96
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.5015.46

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AER and TT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AER

0.66%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
1.60%
Median
0.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is consistent with its peers in the Rental & Leasing Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TT

0.81%

Construction Industry

Max
2.43%
Q3
1.20%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Yield of 0.81% is consistent with its peers in the Construction industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AER

6.80%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
260.58%
Q3
29.91%
Median
17.33%
Q1
6.80%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.80% is within the typical range for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TT

28.37%

Construction Industry

Max
84.31%
Q3
28.17%
Median
11.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.37% is in the upper quartile for the Construction industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAERTT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%0.81%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.80%28.37%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AER

9.85

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
32.56
Q3
29.28
Median
17.35
Q1
9.97
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, AER’s P/E Ratio of 9.85 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TT

35.67

Construction Industry

Max
52.50
Q3
32.30
Median
22.66
Q1
14.68
Min
9.62

A P/E Ratio of 35.67 places TT in the upper quartile for the Construction industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Construction industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AER

1.33

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
2.33
Median
1.39
Q1
0.91
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Rental & Leasing Services industry.

TT

3.12

Construction Industry

Max
4.11
Q3
2.42
Median
1.60
Q1
1.15
Min
0.27

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Construction industry.

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AER

2.56

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.16
Median
2.03
Q1
0.60
Min
0.25

AER’s P/S Ratio of 2.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TT

4.80

Construction Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
3.38
Median
1.63
Q1
0.99
Min
0.09

TT’s P/S Ratio of 4.80 is in the upper echelon for the Construction industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AER

1.22

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
2.65
Median
2.02
Q1
1.37
Min
0.69

AER’s P/B Ratio of 1.22 is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TT

13.03

Construction Industry

Max
12.88
Q3
6.91
Median
3.04
Q1
1.93
Min
0.71

At 13.03, TT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AER vs. TT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Construction industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAERTT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)9.8535.67
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.333.12
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.564.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.2213.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-9.8034.48
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)12.5424.98
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.225.00