Seek Returns logo

AER vs. RSG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AER and RSG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

RSG’s market capitalization of 75.36 billion USD is significantly greater than AER’s 20.46 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AER’s beta of 1.40 points to significantly higher volatility compared to RSG (beta: 0.64), suggesting AER has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAERRSG
Company NameAerCap Holdings N.V.Republic Services, Inc.
CountryIEUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesWaste Management
CEOAengus KellyJon Vander Ark
Price115.89 USD241.14 USD
Market Cap20.46 billion USD75.36 billion USD
Beta1.400.64
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 21, 2006July 1, 1998
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AER and RSG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AER vs. RSG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AER

12.55%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
33.37%
Q3
21.32%
Median
10.48%
Q1
2.04%
Min
-2.71%

AER’s Return on Equity of 12.55% is on par with the norm for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RSG

18.40%

Waste Management Industry

Max
40.07%
Q3
22.07%
Median
11.65%
Q1
-3.10%
Min
-27.58%

RSG’s Return on Equity of 18.40% is on par with the norm for the Waste Management industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AER

3.17%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
19.57%
Q3
13.92%
Median
5.28%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-10.86%

AER’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.17% is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

RSG

9.07%

Waste Management Industry

Max
9.07%
Q3
7.95%
Median
3.52%
Q1
1.30%
Min
-4.75%

In the upper quartile for the Waste Management industry, RSG’s Return on Invested Capital of 9.07% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AER

26.77%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
26.77%
Q3
17.31%
Median
5.12%
Q1
-0.51%
Min
-19.03%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RSG

12.88%

Waste Management Industry

Max
12.88%
Q3
11.97%
Median
6.76%
Q1
-0.76%
Min
-9.89%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.88% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Waste Management industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AER

32.92%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
53.21%
Q3
29.93%
Median
16.64%
Q1
8.88%
Min
-12.57%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.92% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RSG

20.22%

Waste Management Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
13.63%
Median
7.87%
Q1
1.29%
Min
-5.01%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.22% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Waste Management industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAERRSG
Return on Equity (TTM)12.55%18.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.95%6.30%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.17%9.07%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.77%12.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.92%20.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.97%36.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AER

3.12

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
7.05
Q3
3.95
Median
1.87
Q1
0.85
Min
0.64

AER’s Current Ratio of 3.12 aligns with the median group of the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RSG

0.66

Waste Management Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.98
Median
1.06
Q1
0.79
Min
0.66

RSG’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Waste Management industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AER

2.69

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
3.50
Median
2.49
Q1
0.92
Min
0.00

AER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.69 is typical for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RSG

1.16

Waste Management Industry

Max
2.64
Q3
1.57
Median
1.12
Q1
0.87
Min
0.07

RSG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.16 is typical for the Waste Management industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AER

5.50

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.53
Q3
5.33
Median
2.35
Q1
1.41
Min
-1.09

AER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.50 is in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

RSG

6.06

Waste Management Industry

Max
6.06
Q3
5.49
Median
2.34
Q1
0.26
Min
-2.04

RSG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.06 is in the upper quartile for the Waste Management industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAERRSG
Current Ratio (TTM)3.120.66
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.060.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.691.16
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.640.41
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)8.632.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.506.06

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AER and RSG. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AER

0.66%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
1.60%
Median
0.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is consistent with its peers in the Rental & Leasing Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RSG

0.96%

Waste Management Industry

Max
1.38%
Q3
0.73%
Median
0.06%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.96%, RSG offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Waste Management industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AER

6.80%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
260.58%
Q3
29.91%
Median
17.33%
Q1
6.80%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.80% is within the typical range for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RSG

33.57%

Waste Management Industry

Max
49.31%
Q3
43.13%
Median
17.31%
Q1
0.26%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.57% is within the typical range for the Waste Management industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAERRSG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%0.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.80%33.57%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AER

9.85

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
32.56
Q3
29.28
Median
17.35
Q1
9.97
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, AER’s P/E Ratio of 9.85 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RSG

36.21

Waste Management Industry

Max
76.31
Q3
66.40
Median
35.51
Q1
32.40
Min
9.07

RSG’s P/E Ratio of 36.21 is within the middle range for the Waste Management industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AER

1.33

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
2.33
Median
1.39
Q1
0.91
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Rental & Leasing Services industry.

RSG

3.71

Waste Management Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
4.74
Median
2.97
Q1
0.85
Min
0.06

RSG’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.71 is within the middle range of its peers in the Waste Management industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AER

2.56

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.16
Median
2.03
Q1
0.60
Min
0.25

AER’s P/S Ratio of 2.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RSG

4.66

Waste Management Industry

Max
5.29
Q3
4.49
Median
3.59
Q1
1.82
Min
0.31

RSG’s P/S Ratio of 4.66 is in the upper echelon for the Waste Management industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AER

1.22

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
2.65
Median
2.02
Q1
1.37
Min
0.69

AER’s P/B Ratio of 1.22 is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

RSG

6.47

Waste Management Industry

Max
10.62
Q3
6.13
Median
4.78
Q1
2.85
Min
1.68

RSG’s P/B Ratio of 6.47 is in the upper tier for the Waste Management industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AER vs. RSG: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Waste Management industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAERRSG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)9.8536.21
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.333.71
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.564.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.226.47
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-9.8032.07
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)12.5418.15
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.225.49