Seek Returns logo

AER vs. MTZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AER and MTZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AER’s market capitalization of 20.46 billion USD is substantially larger than MTZ’s 13.56 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.40 for AER and 1.75 for MTZ, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAERMTZ
Company NameAerCap Holdings N.V.MasTec, Inc.
CountryIEUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesEngineering & Construction
CEOAengus KellyJose Ramon Mas
Price115.89 USD171.89 USD
Market Cap20.46 billion USD13.56 billion USD
Beta1.401.75
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 21, 2006February 21, 1973
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AER and MTZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AER vs. MTZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AER

12.55%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
33.37%
Q3
21.32%
Median
10.48%
Q1
2.04%
Min
-2.71%

AER’s Return on Equity of 12.55% is on par with the norm for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MTZ

7.56%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 7.56% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AER

3.17%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
19.57%
Q3
13.92%
Median
5.28%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-10.86%

AER’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.17% is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

MTZ

7.62%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

MTZ’s Return on Invested Capital of 7.62% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AER

26.77%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
26.77%
Q3
17.31%
Median
5.12%
Q1
-0.51%
Min
-19.03%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MTZ

1.72%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 1.72% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AER

32.92%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
53.21%
Q3
29.93%
Median
16.64%
Q1
8.88%
Min
-12.57%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.92% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MTZ

4.66%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.66% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAERMTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)12.55%7.56%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.95%2.41%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.17%7.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.77%1.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.92%4.66%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.97%12.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AER

3.12

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
7.05
Q3
3.95
Median
1.87
Q1
0.85
Min
0.64

AER’s Current Ratio of 3.12 aligns with the median group of the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MTZ

1.22

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 falls into the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AER

2.69

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
3.50
Median
2.49
Q1
0.92
Min
0.00

AER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.69 is typical for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MTZ

0.91

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

MTZ’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.91. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AER

5.50

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.53
Q3
5.33
Median
2.35
Q1
1.41
Min
-1.09

AER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.50 is in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MTZ

3.22

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAERMTZ
Current Ratio (TTM)3.121.22
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.061.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.690.91
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.640.30
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)8.632.41
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.503.22

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AER and MTZ. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AER

0.66%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
1.60%
Median
0.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is consistent with its peers in the Rental & Leasing Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MTZ

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AER

6.80%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
260.58%
Q3
29.91%
Median
17.33%
Q1
6.80%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.80% is within the typical range for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MTZ

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAERMTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.80%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AER

9.85

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
32.56
Q3
29.28
Median
17.35
Q1
9.97
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, AER’s P/E Ratio of 9.85 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MTZ

62.84

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

A P/E Ratio of 62.84 places MTZ in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AER

1.33

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
2.33
Median
1.39
Q1
0.91
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Rental & Leasing Services industry.

MTZ

3.22

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AER

2.56

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.16
Median
2.03
Q1
0.60
Min
0.25

AER’s P/S Ratio of 2.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MTZ

1.09

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.09 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AER

1.22

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
2.65
Median
2.02
Q1
1.37
Min
0.69

AER’s P/B Ratio of 1.22 is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MTZ

4.66

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.66 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AER vs. MTZ: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAERMTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)9.8562.84
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.333.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.561.09
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.224.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-9.8014.72
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)12.5416.72
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.221.27